Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

A Critical Comparison Among Pansharpening Algorithms

Gemine VivoneDepartment of Information Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Science and Technology Organization (STO) Center for Maritime Research and Experimentation, La Spezia, ItalyLuciano AlparoneDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, Florence, ItalyJocelyn ChanussotGrenoble Images Speech Signals and Automatics Laboratory (GIPSA-Lab), University of Iceland, Reykjavík, IcelandMauro Dalla MuraGrenoble Images Speech Signals and Automatics Laboratory (GIPSA-Lab), Grenoble Institute of Technology, Grenoble, FranceAndrea GarzelliDepartment of Information Engineering and Mathematical Sciences, University of Siena, Siena, ItalyGiorgio LicciardiGrenoble Images Speech Signals and Automatics Laboratory (GIPSA-Lab), Grenoble Institute of Technology, Grenoble, FranceRocco RestainoDepartment of Information Engineering, Electrical Engineering and Applied Mathematics, University of Salerno, Fisciano, ItalyLucien WaldCenter Observation, Impacts, Energy, MINES ParisTech, Sophia Antipolis, France
2014en
ABI

Аннотация

Pansharpening aims at fusing a multispectral and a panchromatic image, featuring the result of the processing with the spectral resolution of the former and the spatial resolution of the latter. In the last decades, many algorithms addressing this task have been presented in the literature. However, the lack of universally recognized evaluation criteria, available image data sets for benchmarking, and standardized implementations of the algorithms makes a thorough evaluation and comparison of the different pansharpening techniques difficult to achieve. In this paper, the authors attempt to fill this gap by providing a critical description and extensive comparisons of some of the main state-of-the-art pansharpening methods. In greater details, several pansharpening algorithms belonging to the component substitution or multiresolution analysis families are considered. Such techniques are evaluated through the two main protocols for the assessment of pansharpening results, i.e., based on the full- and reduced-resolution validations. Five data sets acquired by different satellites allow for a detailed comparison of the algorithms, characterization of their performances with respect to the different instruments, and consistency of the two validation procedures. In addition, the implementation of all the pansharpening techniques considered in this paper and the framework used for running the simulations, comprising the two validation procedures and the main assessment indexes, are collected in a MATLAB toolbox that is made available to the community.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0