Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Incidence of urinary incontinence following endoscopic laser enucleation of the prostate by en-bloc and non-en-bloc techniques: a multicenter, real-world experience of 5068 patients

Daniele CastellaniUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona 60127, ItalyVineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore 609606, SingaporeKhi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, SingaporeMario SoferDepartment of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Affiliated to the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, IsraelM.E. Rodríguez SocarrásDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid 28701, SpainAzimdjon TursunkulovUrology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent 100211, UzbekistanLie Kwok YingAdvanced Urology, Gleneagles Hospital, Singapore 258499, SingaporeSarvajit BiligereDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore 609606, SingaporeHo Yee TiongDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore 119228, SingaporeDean EltermanDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Toronto M5G 2C4, CanadaAbhay MahajanDepartment of Urology, Mahatma Gandhi Mission’s Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad 431003, IndiaMark TaratkinInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow119435, Russian FederationSorokin Nikolai IvanovichDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow 119992, Russian FederationTanuj BhatiaDepartment of Urology, Sarvodaya Hospital and Research Centre, Faridabad, Haryana 121006, IndiaDmitry EnikeevDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna 1090, AustriaNariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russian FederationMohammed Taif BendigeriDepartment of Urology, Asian Institute of Nephrology and Urology, Hyderabad 500082, IndiaJeremy Yuen‐Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong 96H2+Q9, ChinaMarco DellabellaUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona 60127, ItalyFernando Gómez SanchaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid 28701, SpainBhaskar SomaniIstituto Nazionale di Riposo e Cura per AnzianiThomas Reinhard William HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Cantonal Hospital Thurgau AG, Fraunfeld 8500, Switzerland
ABI

Аннотация

We aim to evaluate the incidence of incontinence following laser endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) comparing en-bloc (Group 1) versus 2-lobe/3-lobe techniques (Group 2). We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing EEP for benign prostatic enlargement in 12 centers between January 2020 and January 2022. Data were presented as median and interquartile range (IQR). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate factors associated with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI). There were 1711 patients in Group 1 and 3357 patients in Group 2. Patients in Group 2 were significantly younger (68 [62-73] years vs 69 [63-74] years, P = 0.002). Median (interquartile range) prostate volume (PV) was similar between the groups (70 [52-92] ml in Group 1 vs 70 [54-90] ml in Group 2, P = 0.774). There was no difference in preoperative International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, or maximum flow rate. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly shorter in Group 1. Within 1 month, overall incontinence rate was 6.3% in Group 1 versus 5.3% in Group 2 ( P = 0.12), and urge incontinence was significantly higher in Group 1 (55.1% vs 37.3% in Group 2, P < 0.001). After 3 months, the overall rate of incontinence was 1.7% in Group 1 versus 2.3% in Group 2 ( P = 0.06), and SUI was significantly higher in Group 2 (55.6% vs 24.1% in Group 1, P = 0.002). At multivariable analysis, PV and IPSS were factors significantly associated with higher odds of transient SUI/MUI. PV, surgical time, and no early apical release technique were factors associated with higher odds of persistent SUI/MUI.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники