Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Incidence of complications and urinary incontinence following endoscopic enucleation of the prostate in men with a prostate volume of 80 ml and above: results from a multicenter, real-world experience of 2512 patients

Vineet GauharDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeDaniele CastellaniUrology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Via Conca 71, 60126, Ancona, Italy. [email protected]Thomas HerrmannDepartment of Urology, Kantonspital Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, SwitzerlandMehmet İlker GökçeDepartment of Urology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, TurkeyKhi Yung FongYong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, SingaporeNariman GadzhievDepartment of Urology, Saint-Petersburg State University Hospital, Saint-Petersburg, Russian FederationVigen MalkhasyanUrology Unit, A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry, Moscow, Russian FederationGiacomo Maria PirolaUrology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, ItalyAngelo NaselliUrology Unit, San Giuseppe Hospital, IRCCS Multimedica, Multimedica Group, Milan, ItalyAbhay MahajanSai Urology Hospital and Mahatma Gandhi Mission's Medical College and Hospital, Aurangabad, IndiaPankaj N. MaheshwariUrology Unit, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Mumbai, IndiaSarvajit BiligereDepartment of Urology, Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeAzimdjon TursunkulovUrology Division, AkfaMedline Hospital, Tashkent, UzbekistanF. NasirovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian FederationVladislav PetovInstitute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russian FederationMarco DellabellaUrology Unit, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, ItalyEe Jean LimDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, SingaporeM.E. Rodríguez SocarrásDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, SpainMarek ZawadzkiUrology Unit, St. Anna Hospital, Piaseczno, PolandLuigi CormioAndrology and Urology Unit, Bonomo Teaching Hospital, Andria, ItalyGian Maria BusettoDepartment of Urology, Ospedali Riuniti di Foggia, University of Foggia, Foggia, ItalyJeremy Yuen‐Chun TeohS.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaBhaskar SomaniDmitry EnikeevDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaMario SoferDepartment of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, IsraelFernando Gómez SanchaDepartment of Urology and Robotic Surgery, ICUA-Clínica CEMTRO, Madrid, Spain
World Journal of Urologyjournal2024en
ABI

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To evaluate complications and urinary incontinence (UI) after endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (EEP) stratified by prostate volume (PV). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia who underwent EEP with different energy sources in 14 centers (January 2019-January 2023). INCLUSION CRITERIA: prostate volume ≥ 80 ml. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: prostate cancer, previous prostate/urethral surgery, pelvic radiotherapy. PRIMARY OUTCOME: complication rate. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: incidence of and factors affecting postoperative UI. Patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1: PV = 80-100 ml; Group 2 PV = 101-200 ml; Group 3 PV > 200 ml. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate independent predictors of overall incontinence. RESULTS: There were 486 patients in Group 1, 1830 in Group 2, and 196 in Group 3. The most commonly used energy was high-power Holmium laser followed by Thulium fiber laser in all groups. Enucleation, morcellation, and total surgical time were significantly longer in Group 2. There was no significant difference in overall 30-day complications and readmission rates. Incontinence incidence was similar (12.1% in Group 1 vs. 13.2% in Group 2 vs. 11.7% in Group 3, p = 0.72). The rate of stress and mixed incontinence was higher in Group 1. Multivariable regression analysis showed that age (OR 1.019 95% CI 1.003-1.035) was the only factor significantly associated with higher odds of incontinence. CONCLUSIONS: PV has no influence on complication and UI rates following EEP. Age is risk factor of postoperative UI.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники