Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

RANDOM FORESTS FOR CLASSIFICATION IN ECOLOGY

D. Richard CutlerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-3900, USA. [email protected]Thomas C. EdwardsDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-3900 USAKaren H. BeardDepartment of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5230 USAAdele CutlerDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-3900 USAKyle T. HessDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-3900 USAJacob GibsonDepartment of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322-5230 USAJoshua J. LawlerCollege of Forest Resources, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-2100 USA
2007en
ABI

Аннотация

Classification procedures are some of the most widely used statistical methods in ecology. Random forests (RF) is a new and powerful statistical classifier that is well established in other disciplines but is relatively unknown in ecology. Advantages of RF compared to other statistical classifiers include (1) very high classification accuracy; (2) a novel method of determining variable importance; (3) ability to model complex interactions among predictor variables; (4) flexibility to perform several types of statistical data analysis, including regression, classification, survival analysis, and unsupervised learning; and (5) an algorithm for imputing missing values. We compared the accuracies of RF and four other commonly used statistical classifiers using data on invasive plant species presence in Lava Beds National Monument, California, USA, rare lichen species presence in the Pacific Northwest, USA, and nest sites for cavity nesting birds in the Uinta Mountains, Utah, USA. We observed high classification accuracy in all applications as measured by cross-validation and, in the case of the lichen data, by independent test data, when comparing RF to other common classification methods. We also observed that the variables that RF identified as most important for classifying invasive plant species coincided with expectations based on the literature.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 5Использованных источников: 0