Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1% measurement of the angular baryonic acoustic oscillation scale at redshift <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>eff</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> from the final dataset

T. M. C. AbbottNSF’s National Optical-Infrared Astronomy Research LaboratoryM. AdamówM. AguenaLaboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneAS. AllamFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryO. AlvesUniversity of MichiganA. AmonPrinceton UniversityF. Andrade-OliveiraUniversity of MichiganJ. AsoreyUniversidad Complutense de MadridS. ÀvilaThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyD. BaconUniversity of PortsmouthK. BechtolUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonG. M. BernsteinUniversity of PennsylvaniaE. BertinCNRSJ. BlazekNortheastern UniversityS. BocquetDavid H. BrooksUniversity College LondonD. L. BurkeSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryH. CamachoBrookhaven National LaboratoryA. Carnero RosellUniversidad de La LagunaD. CarolloINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteAnthony CarrUniversidad de La LagunaJ. CarreteroThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyF. J. CastanderInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)R. CawthonWilliam Jewell CollegeKwan Chuen ChanCSST Science Center for the Guangdong-Hongkong-Macau Greater Bay AreaC. ChangUniversity of ChicagoC. ConseliceUniversity of ManchesterM. CostanziINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteM. CrocceInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)L. N. da CostaLaboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneAM. E. S. PereiraUniversität HamburgT. M. DavisUniversity of QueenslandJ. De VicenteMedioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)N. DeiossoMedioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)S. DesaiIIT HyderabadH. T. DiehlFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryScott DodelsonCarnegie Mellon UniversityC. DouxUniversity of PennsylvaniaA. Drlica-WagnerFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryJ. Elvin-PooleUniversity of WaterlooS. EverettCalifornia Institute of TechnologyI. FerreroUniversity of OsloA. FertéSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryB. FlaugherFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryP FosalbaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)J. FriemanFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryJ. García-BellidoUniversidad Autonoma de MadridE. GaztañagaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)G. GianniniThe Barcelona Institute of Science and TechnologyKarl GlazebrookCalifornia Institute of TechnologyR. A. GruendlNational Center for Supercomputing ApplicationsG. GutierrezFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryW. G. HartleyUniversity of GenevaS. R. HintonUniversity of QueenslandD. L. HollowoodSanta Cruz Institute for Particle PhysicsKlaus HonscheidThe Ohio State UniversityDragan HutererUniversity of MichiganD. J. JamesCenter for Astrophysics | Harvard & SmithsonianS. KentFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryK. KuehnLowell ObservatoryO. LahavUniversity College LondonS LeeCalifornia Institute of TechnologyGeraint F. LewisMacquarie UniversityC. LidmanAustralian National UniversityM. LimaAustralian National UniversityH. LinFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryU MalikTexas A&M UniversityClaudia MarastonUniversidad Complutense de MadridJ. L. MarshallTexas A&M UniversityPaul MartiniThe Ohio State UniversityJ. Mena-FernándezLPSC Grenoble—53F. MenanteauNational Center for Supercomputing ApplicationsR. MiquelInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis AvançatsJ. J. MohrMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsJ. MylesPrinceton UniversityA. MöllerCalifornia Institute of TechnologyR. C. NicholUniversity of SurreyR. L. C. OgandoObservatório NacionalA. PalmeseCarnegie Mellon UniversityWill J. PercivalPerimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsA. PieresLaboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneAA. A. Plazas MalagónSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryA. PorredonRuhr University BochumJ. PratKTH Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm UniversityM. Rodríguez-MonroyLaboratoire de physique des 2 infinis Irène Joliot-CurieA. K. RomerUniversity of SussexA. RoodmanSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryR. RosenfeldLaboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneAA.J. RossThe Ohio State UniversityE. S. RykoffSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryM. SakoUniversity of PennsylvaniaS. SamuroffNortheastern UniversityC. SánchezUniversity of PennsylvaniaE. SánchezMedioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)D. Sanchez CidMedioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)B. X. SantiagoLaboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia—LIneAM. SchubnellUniversity of MichiganI. Sevilla-NoarbeMedioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)E. SheldonBrookhaven National LaboratoryM. SmithUniversity of Southampton
2024lv
ABI

Аннотация

We present the angular diameter distance measurement obtained with the baryonic acoustic oscillation (BAO) feature from galaxy clustering in the completed Dark Energy Survey, consisting of six years (Y6) of observations. We use the Y6 BAO galaxy sample, optimized for BAO science in the redshift range $0.6&lt;z&lt;1.2$, with an effective redshift at ${z}_{\mathrm{eff}}=0.85$ and split into six tomographic bins. The sample has nearly 16 million galaxies over 4,273 square degrees. Our consensus measurement constrains the ratio of the angular distance to sound horizon scale to ${D}_{M}({z}_{\mathrm{eff}})/{r}_{d}=19.51\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.41$ (at 68.3% confidence interval), resulting from comparing the BAO position in our data to that predicted by planck $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ via the BAO shift parameter $\ensuremath{\alpha}=({D}_{M}/{r}_{d})/({D}_{M}/{r}_{d}{)}_{\mathrm{PLANCK}}$. To achieve this, the BAO shift is measured with three different methods, angular correlation function (ACF), angular power spectrum (APS), and projected correlation function (PCF), obtaining $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.952\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.023$, $0.962\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.022$, and $0.955\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.020$, respectively, which we combine to $\ensuremath{\alpha}=0.957\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.020$, including systematic errors. When compared with the $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Lambda}}\mathrm{CDM}$ model that best fits planck data, this measurement is found to be 4.3% and $2.1\ensuremath{\sigma}$ below the angular BAO scale predicted. To date, it represents the most precise angular BAO measurement at $z&gt;0.75$ from any survey and the most precise measurement at any redshift from photometric surveys. The analysis was performed blinded to the BAO position, and it is shown to be robust against analysis choices, data removal, redshift calibrations, and observational systematics.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0