Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints

M. Abdul KarimUniversité Paris-SaclayJ. AguilarLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryS. AhlenBoston UniversityShadab AlamTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchL. AllenNSF NOIRLabCarlos Allende PrietoInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasO. AlvesUniversity of MichiganAbhijeet AnandLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryU. AndradeUniversity of MichiganE. ArmengaudUniversité Paris-SaclayAlejandro AvilésInstituto Avanzado de Cosmología A. CS. BaileyLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryC. BaltayYale UniversityP. BansalUniversity of MichiganA. BaultLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryJayashree BeheraKansas State UniversityS. BenZviUniversity of RochesterDavide BianchiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraChris BlakeSwinburne University of TechnologyS. BriedenUniversity of EdinburghA. BrodzellerLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryD. BrooksUniversity College LondonE. Buckley‐GeerFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryE. BurtinUniversité Paris-SaclayR. CalderónInstitute of Physics of the Czech Academy of SciencesR. CanningUniversity of PortsmouthA. Carnero RosellInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasP. CarrilhoUniversity of EdinburghLidia CasasInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)F. J. CastanderInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)M. CharlesThe Ohio State UniversityE. ChaussidonLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryJ. Chaves-MonteroInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)D. ChebatUniversité Paris-SaclayXinyi ChenYale UniversityT. ClaybaughLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryShaun ColeDurham UniversityAndrew P. CooperNational Tsing Hua UniversityAndrei CuceuLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryKyle DawsonThe University of UtahAxel de la MacorraUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoArnaud de MattiaUniversité Paris-SaclayN. DeiossoCIEMATJ. Della CostaNSF NOIRLabR. DeminaUniversity of RochesterArjun DeyNSF NOIRLabBiprateep DeyUniversity of PittsburghZ. DingUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesP. DoelUniversity College LondonJerry EdelsteinUniversity of CaliforniaDaniel J. EisensteinCenter for Astrophysics | Harvard & SmithsonianWillem ElbersDurham UniversityParker FagreliusNSF NOIRLabK. FanningSLAC National Accelerator LaboratoryE. Fernández-GarcíaInstituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía (CSIC)S. FerraroLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryAndreu Font-RiberaInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)J. E. Forero-RomeroUniversidad de los AndesCarlos S. FrenkDurham UniversityC. García-QuinteroCenter for Astrophysics | Harvard & SmithsonianLehman H. GarrisonFlatiron InstituteE. GaztañagaInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)Héctor Gil-MarínInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC)Satya Gontcho A GontchoLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryD. GonzalezUniversidad de GuanajuatoAlma X. González‐MoralesUniversidad de GuanajuatoC. GordonInstitut de Física d’Altes Energies (IFAE)D. GreenUniversity of CaliforniaG. GutiérrezFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryJ. GuyLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryBoryana HadzhiyskaLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryChang Hoon HahnUniversity of ArizonaS. HeM. HerboldThe Ohio State UniversityH. K. Herrera-AlcantarInstitut d’Astrophysique de ParisMing-Feng HoUniversity of MichiganK. HonscheidThe Ohio State UniversityCullan HowlettUniversity of QueenslandDragan HutererUniversity of MichiganMustapha IshakThe University of Texas at DallasS. JuneauNSF NOIRLabN. V. KambleThe University of Texas at DallasNaim Göksel KaraçaylıThe Ohio State UniversityR. KehoeSouthern Methodist UniversityS. KentFermi National Accelerator LaboratoryAlex KimLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryD. KirkbyUniversity of CaliforniaTheodore KisnerLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryS. E. KoposovUniversity of CambridgeAnthony KreminLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryAlex KrolewskiPerimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsO LahavUniversity College LondonC. LammanCenter for Astrophysics | Harvard & SmithsonianMartin LandriauLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryDustin LangPerimeter Institute for Theoretical PhysicsJ. LaskerAstrophysics and Space InstituteJ.M. Le GoffUniversité Paris-SaclayL. Le GuillouSorbonne UniversitéAlexie LeauthaudUniversity of CaliforniaM. E. LeviLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
2025en
ABI

Аннотация

We present baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from more than 14 million galaxies and quasars drawn from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) Data Release 2 (DR2), based on three years of operation. For cosmology inference, these galaxy measurements are combined with DESI Lyman- <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <a:mi>α</a:mi> </a:math> forest BAO results presented in a companion paper (M. Abdul-Karim , companion paper, .). The DR2 BAO results are consistent with DESI DR1 and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey, and their distance-redshift relationship matches those from recent compilations of supernovae (SNe) over the same redshift range. The results are well described by a flat <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <c:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</c:mi> </c:math> cold dark matter ( <f:math xmlns:f="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <f:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</f:mi> <f:mi>CDM</f:mi> </f:math> ) model, but the parameters preferred by BAO are in mild, <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <i:mn>2.3</i:mn> <i:mi>σ</i:mi> </i:math> tension with those determined from the cosmic microwave background (CMB), although the DESI results are consistent with the acoustic angular scale <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <k:msub> <k:mi>θ</k:mi> <k:mo>*</k:mo> </k:msub> </k:math> that is well measured by Planck. This tension is alleviated by dark energy with a time-evolving equation of state parametrized by <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <m:msub> <m:mi>w</m:mi> <m:mn>0</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:math> and <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <o:msub> <o:mi>w</o:mi> <o:mi>a</o:mi> </o:msub> </o:math> , which provides a better fit to the data, with a favored solution in the quadrant with <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <q:msub> <q:mi>w</q:mi> <q:mn>0</q:mn> </q:msub> <q:mo>&gt;</q:mo> <q:mo>−</q:mo> <q:mn>1</q:mn> </q:math> and <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <s:msub> <s:mi>w</s:mi> <s:mi>a</s:mi> </s:msub> <s:mo>&lt;</s:mo> <s:mn>0</s:mn> </s:math> . This solution is preferred over <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <u:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</u:mi> <u:mi>CDM</u:mi> </u:math> at <x:math xmlns:x="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <x:mn>3.1</x:mn> <x:mi>σ</x:mi> </x:math> for the combination of DESI BAO and CMB data. When also including SNe, the preference for a dynamical dark energy model over <z:math xmlns:z="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <z:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</z:mi> <z:mi>CDM</z:mi> </z:math> ranges from <cb:math xmlns:cb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <cb:mn>2.8</cb:mn> <cb:mo>−</cb:mo> <cb:mn>4.2</cb:mn> <cb:mi>σ</cb:mi> </cb:math> depending on which SNe sample is used. We present evidence from other data combinations which also favor the same behavior at high significance. From the combination of DESI and CMB we derive 95% upper limits on the sum of neutrino masses, finding <eb:math xmlns:eb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <eb:mo>∑</eb:mo> <eb:msub> <eb:mi>m</eb:mi> <eb:mi>ν</eb:mi> </eb:msub> <eb:mo>&lt;</eb:mo> <eb:mn>0.064</eb:mn> <eb:mtext> </eb:mtext> <eb:mtext> </eb:mtext> <eb:mi>eV</eb:mi> </eb:math> assuming <gb:math xmlns:gb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <gb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</gb:mi> <gb:mi>CDM</gb:mi> </gb:math> and <jb:math xmlns:jb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <jb:mo>∑</jb:mo> <jb:msub> <jb:mi>m</jb:mi> <jb:mi>ν</jb:mi> </jb:msub> <jb:mo>&lt;</jb:mo> <jb:mn>0.16</jb:mn> <jb:mtext> </jb:mtext> <jb:mtext> </jb:mtext> <jb:mi>eV</jb:mi> </jb:math> in the <lb:math xmlns:lb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <lb:msub> <lb:mi>w</lb:mi> <lb:mn>0</lb:mn> </lb:msub> <lb:msub> <lb:mi>w</lb:mi> <lb:mi>a</lb:mi> </lb:msub> </lb:math> model. Unless there is an unknown systematic error associated with one or more datasets, it is clear that <nb:math xmlns:nb="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <nb:mi mathvariant="normal">Λ</nb:mi> <nb:mi>CDM</nb:mi> </nb:math> is being challenged by the combination of DESI BAO with other measurements and that dynamical dark energy offers a possible solution.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0