Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Interpretable Machine Learning Approaches for Forecasting and Predicting Air Pollution: A Systematic Review

Anass HoudouInternational School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Casablanca, MoroccoImad El BadisyInserm UMR912 Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale (SESSTIM), Marseille, FranceKenza KhomsiDirectorate General of Meteorology, Casablanca, MoroccoSammila Andrade AbdalaInternational School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Casablanca, MoroccoFayez AbdullaCivil Engineering Department, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22120, JordanHouda NajmiDirectorate General of Meteorology, Casablanca, MoroccoMajdouline ObtelLahcen BelyamaniFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, MoroccoAzeddine IbrahimiFaculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat, MoroccoMohamed KhalisInternational School of Public Health, Mohammed VI University of Sciences and Health, Casablanca, Morocco
2023en
ABI

Аннотация

Many studies use machine learning to predict atmospheric pollutant levels, prioritizing accuracy over interpretability. This systematic review will focus on reviewing studies that have utilized interpretable machine learning models to enhance interpretability while maintaining high accuracy for air pollution prediction. The search terms "air pollution," "machine learning," and "interpretability" were used to identify relevant studies published between 2011 and 2023 from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and JuSER. The included studies were assessed for quality based on an ecological checklist for maximizing reproducibility of ecological niche models. Among the 5,396 identified studies, 480 focused on air pollution prediction, with 56 providing model interpretations. Among the studies, 20 methods were identified: 8 model-agnostic methods, 4 model-specific methods, and 8 hybrid models. Shapley additive explanations was the most commonly used method (46.4%), followed by partial dependence plots (17.4%), both of which are model-agnostic methods. These methods identify important atmospheric features, enhancing researchers' understanding and making machine learning outcomes more accessible to non-experts. This can enhance prediction and prevention of adverse weather events and air pollution, benefiting public health.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0