Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Landscape effects on crop pollination services: are there general patterns?

Taylor H. RickettsConservation Science Program, WWF, Washington D.C., USA. [email protected]James RegetzNCEAS, Santa Barbara, CA, USAIngolf Steffan‐DewenterDepartment of Animal Ecology I, Population Ecology, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth GermanySaul A. CunninghamCSIRO Entomology, Canberra, Australia,Claire KremenESPM, UC Berkeley, California, USAAnne BogdanskiSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury , Christchurch, New ZealandBarbara Gemmill‐HerrenFAO, Rome, ItalySarah S. GreenleafDepartment of Biological Sciences, California State University Sacramento, CA, USAAlexandra‐Maria KleinAgroecology, University of Gottingen, Gottingen, GermanyMargaret M. MayfieldSchool of Integrative Biology University of Queensland, Brisbane,
QLD, Australia
Lora A. MorandinDept of Biological Sciences Simon Fraser Univ. Burnaby BC CanadaAlfred O. OchiengInternational Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology Nairobi, KenyaBlande F. VianaDepartment of Zoology, Biology Institute, Federal University of Bahia, Bahia, Brazil
2008en
ABI

Аннотация

Pollination by bees and other animals increases the size, quality, or stability of harvests for 70% of leading global crops. Because native species pollinate many of these crops effectively, conserving habitats for wild pollinators within agricultural landscapes can help maintain pollination services. Using hierarchical Bayesian techniques, we synthesize the results of 23 studies - representing 16 crops on five continents - to estimate the general relationship between pollination services and distance from natural or semi-natural habitats. We find strong exponential declines in both pollinator richness and native visitation rate. Visitation rate declines more steeply, dropping to half of its maximum at 0.6 km from natural habitat, compared to 1.5 km for richness. Evidence of general decline in fruit and seed set - variables that directly affect yields - is less clear. Visitation rate drops more steeply in tropical compared with temperate regions, and slightly more steeply for social compared with solitary bees. Tropical crops pollinated primarily by social bees may therefore be most susceptible to pollination failure from habitat loss. Quantifying these general relationships can help predict consequences of land use change on pollinator communities and crop productivity, and can inform landscape conservation efforts that balance the needs of native species and people.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0