Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

JET BREAKS AND ENERGETICS OF<i>Swift</i>GAMMA-RAY BURST X-RAY AFTERGLOWS

J. L. RacusinDepartment of Astronomy & Astrophysics, the Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USAEn‐Wei LiangDepartment of Physics, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, ChinaD. N. BurrowsDepartment of Astronomy & Astrophysics, the Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USAA. FalconeDepartment of Astronomy & Astrophysics, the Pennsylvania State University, 525 Davey Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USAT. SakamotoAstrophysics Science Division, Code 661, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USABingbing ZhangDepartment of Physics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USABing ZhangDepartment of Physics, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USAN. Gehrels#N# Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UKJ. P. Osborne#N# Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
2009en
ABI

Аннотация

We present a systematic temporal and spectral study of all Swift-X-ray Telescope observations of gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows discovered between 2005 January and 2007 December. After constructing and fitting all light curves and spectra to power-law models, we classify the components of each afterglow in terms of the canonical X-ray afterglow and test them against the closure relations of the forward shock models for a variety of parameter combinations. The closure relations are used to identify potential jet breaks with characteristics including the uniform jet model with and without lateral spreading and energy injection, and a power-law structured jet model, all with a range of parameters. With this technique, we survey the X-ray afterglows with strong evidence for jet breaks (~12% of our sample), and reveal cases of potential jet breaks that do not appear plainly from the light curve alone (another ~30%), leading to insight into the missing jet break problem. Those X-ray light curves that do not show breaks or have breaks that are not consistent with one of the jet models are explored to place limits on the times of unseen jet breaks. The distribution of jet break times ranges from a few hours to a few weeks with a median of ~1 day, similar to what was found pre-Swift. On average, Swift GRBs have lower isotropic equivalent γ-ray energies, which in turn result in lower collimation corrected γ-ray energies than those of pre-Swift GRBs. Finally, we explore the implications for GRB jet geometry and energetics.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 4Использованных источников: 0