Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
Bruce D. ChesonFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Beate PfistnerFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Malik E. JuweidFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Randy D. GascoyneFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Lena SpechtFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Sandra J. HorningFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Bertrand CoiffierGeorgetown UniversityRichard I. FisherFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Anton HagenbeekFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Emanuele ZuccaFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Steven T. RosenFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Sigrid StroobantsFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,T. Andrew ListerFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Richard T. HoppeFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Martin DreylingFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Kensei TobinaiGeorgetown UniversityJulie M. VoseFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Joseph M. ConnorsFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Massimo FedericoFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,Volker DiehlFrom the Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; University of Cologne, Cologne; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Department of Pathology, British Columbia Cancer Agency and the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; Department of Oncology and Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark; Division of Oncology and Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford,
2007en
ABI
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Standardized response criteria are needed to interpret and compare clinical trials and for approval of new therapeutic agents by regulatory agencies. METHODS: The International Working Group response criteria (Cheson et al, J Clin Oncol 17:1244, 1999) were widely adopted, but required reassessment because of identified limitations and the increased use of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and flow cytometry. The International Harmonization Project was convened to provide updated recommendations. RESULTS: New guidelines are presented incorporating PET, IHC, and flow cytometry for definitions of response in non-Hodgkin's and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Standardized definitions of end points are provided. CONCLUSION: We hope that these guidelines will be adopted widely by study groups, pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, and regulatory agencies to facilitate the development of new and more effective therapies to improve the outcome of patients with lymphoma.
Перевод пока недоступен
Идентификаторы
Цитирования и источники
Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0