Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

The tortoise and the hare II: relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis

Joey ShawDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAEdgar B. LickeyDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAJohn T. BeckDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USASusan Beth FarmerDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAWusheng LiuDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAJermey MillerDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAKunsiri Chaw SiripunDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USACharles WinderDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USAEdward E. SchillingDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USARandall L. SmallDepartment of Botany, 437 Hesler Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996 USA
2005en
ABI

Аннотация

Chloroplast DNA sequences are a primary source of data for plant molecular systematic studies. A few key papers have provided the molecular systematics community with universal primer pairs for noncoding regions that have dominated the field, namely trnL-trnF and trnK/matK. These two regions have provided adequate information to resolve species relationships in some taxa, but often provide little resolution at low taxonomic levels. To obtain better phylogenetic resolution, sequence data from these regions are often coupled with other sequence data. Choosing an appropriate cpDNA region for phylogenetic investigation is difficult because of the scarcity of information about the tempo of evolutionary rates among different noncoding cpDNA regions. The focus of this investigation was to determine whether there is any predictable rate heterogeneity among 21 noncoding cpDNA regions identified as phylogenetically useful at low levels. To test for rate heterogeneity among the different cpDNA regions, we used three species from each of 10 groups representing eight major phylogenetic lineages of phanerogams. The results of this study clearly show that a survey using as few as three representative taxa can be predictive of the amount of phylogenetic information offered by a cpDNA region and that rate heterogeneity exists among noncoding cpDNA regions.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0