Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data

Jane ElithUniversity of MelbourneCatherine H. GrahamStony Brook UniversityRobert P. AndersonCITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORKMiroslav Dudı́kPrinceton University#TAB#Simon FerrierAntoine GuisanUniversity of LausanneRobert J. HijmansUniversity of California at BerkeleyFalk HuettmannUniv. of Alaska, FairbanksJohn R. LeathwickAnthony LehmannSwiss Centre for Faunal Cartography (CSCF)Jin LiCSIROLúcia G. LohmannUniversidade de Sao Paulo#TAB#Bette A. LoiselleUniv. of Missouri at St. LouisGlenn ManionCraig MoritzUniversity of California at BerkeleyMiguel NakamuraConsejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (México)Yoshinori NakazawaUniversity of KansasJacob McC. OvertonLandcare ResearchA. Townsend PetersonUniversity of KansasSteven J. PhillipsAt&T#TAB#Karen RichardsonMcGill UniversityRicardo Scachetti‐PereiraCentro de Referência Em Informação AmbientalRobert E. SchapireJorge SoberónUniversity of KansasStephen E. Williams(James Cook University, Queensland)Mary S. WiszAarhus UniversityNiklaus E. ZimmermannSwiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow, and Landscape Research
2006en
ABI

Аннотация

Prediction of species’ distributions is central to diverse applications in ecology, evolution and conservation science. There is increasing electronic access to vast sets of occurrence records in museums and herbaria, yet little effective guidance on how best to use this information in the context of numerous approaches for modelling distributions. To meet this need, we compared 16 modelling methods over 226 species from 6 regions of the world, creating the most comprehensive set of model comparisons to date. We used presence‐only data to fit models, and independent presence‐absence data to evaluate the predictions. Along with well‐established modelling methods such as generalised additive models and GARP and BIOCLIM, we explored methods that either have been developed recently or have rarely been applied to modelling species’ distributions. These include machine‐learning methods and community models, both of which have features that may make them particularly well suited to noisy or sparse information, as is typical of species’ occurrence data. Presence‐only data were effective for modelling species’ distributions for many species and regions. The novel methods consistently outperformed more established methods. The results of our analysis are promising for the use of data from museums and herbaria, especially as methods suited to the noise inherent in such data improve.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 5Использованных источников: 0