Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Biogeography of the xerophytic genus <i>Anabasis</i> L. (Chenopodiaceae)

Maximilian LauterbachInstitut für Molekulare Physiologie Johannes Gutenberg‐Universität Mainz Mainz GermanyMarie Claire Veranso‐LibalahInstitut für Molekulare Physiologie Johannes Gutenberg‐Universität Mainz Mainz GermanyAlexander P. SukhorukovDepartment of Higher Plants Biological Faculty Moscow Lomonosov State University Moscow RussiaGudrun KadereitInstitut für Molekulare Physiologie Johannes Gutenberg‐Universität Mainz Mainz Germany
2019en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract Aim Using the extremophile genus Anabasis , which includes c. 28 succulent, xerophytic C 4 species, and is widely distributed in arid regions of Northern Africa, Arabia, and Asia, we investigate biogeographical relationships between the Irano‐Turanian floristic region ( IT fr) and its neighboring regions. We test whether the spread of arid and semi‐arid biomes in Eurasia coincides with the biogeography of this drought‐adapted genus, and whether the IT fr acted as source area of floristic elements for adjacent regions. Location Deserts and semi‐deserts of Northern Africa, Mediterranean, Arabia, West and Central Asia. Methods Four cp DNA markers ( rpL16 intron, atpB‐rbcL, trnQ‐rps16, and ndhF‐rpL32 spacers) were sequenced for 58 accessions representing 21 Anabasis species. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times were inferred using maximum likelihood and a time‐calibrated Bayesian approach. To document the extant distribution of Anabasis , material from 23 herbaria was surveyed resulting in 441 well‐documented collections used for the coding of eight floristic regions. Using this coded data, ancestral range was estimated using “BioGeo BEARS ” under the DEC model. Results Anabasis originated during the Late Miocene and the ancestral range was probably widespread and disjunct between Western Mediterranean and the Irano‐Turanian regions. Diversification started with two divergence events at the Miocene/Pliocene boundary (5.1 and 4.5 mya) leading to Asian clade I with IT fr origin which is sister to a slightly younger Asian clade II , which originated in the Western IT fr, and a Mediterranean/North African clade with an origin in the Western Mediterranean. Main conclusions Anabasis did not follow aridification and continuously expanded its distribution area, in fact its probably wide ancestral distribution area seems to have been fragmented during the very Late Miocene and the remnant lineages then expanded into neighboring arid regions. This genus supports the role of the IT fr as source area for xerophytic elements in the Mediterranean and Central Asia.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0