Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Assessing the Impacts of <i><scp>E</scp>. coli</i> Laden Streambed Sediment on <i>E. coli</i> Loads over a Range of Flows and Sediment Characteristics

Pramod Kumar PandeyDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University 3163 NSRIC Building Ames Iowa 50011Michelle L. SoupirDepartment of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University 3163 NSRIC Building Ames Iowa 50011
2013en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract Understanding sediment E scherichia coli levels (i.e., pathogen indicators) and their contribution to the water column during resuspension is critical for predicting in‐stream E . coli levels and the potential risk to human health. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's current water quality testing strategies, however, rely on water borne E . coli concentrations to assess stream E . coli levels and identify impaired waters. In this work, we conducted a scenario analysis using a range of flows, sediment/water bacteria fractions, and particle sizes to which E . coli attach to assess the impact of E . coli in streambed sediments on water column E . coli levels. We used simple sediment transport theory to calculate the potential total E . coli concentrations in a stream with and without the resuspension process. Results clearly indicate that inclusion of resuspending sediment attached E . coli is necessary for watershed assessments and data on sediment attached E . coli concentrations is much needed. When neglecting the streambed sediment E . coli concentrations, the model predicted average E . coli loads of 10 7 Colony Forming Units (CFU)/s; however, when streambed sediment E . coli concentrations were included in the model, the predictions ranged from 10 10 to 10 14 CFU/s. To evaluate the predictions, E . coli data in the streambed sediment and the water column were monitored in Squaw Creek, Iowa. Comparisons between measured and predicted E . coli loads yielded an R 2 ‐value of 0.85.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 4Использованных источников: 0