Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD): assessing the accuracy of DFT formation energies

Scott KirklinDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USAJames E. SaalDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USABryce MeredigDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USAAlexander ThompsonDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USAJeff W. DoakDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USAMuratahan AykolDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USAStefan RühlFIZ Karlsruhe—Leibniz Institute for Information Infrastructure, Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, GermanyChris WolvertonDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
2015en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract The Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD) is a high-throughput database currently consisting of nearly 300,000 density functional theory (DFT) total energy calculations of compounds from the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD) and decorations of commonly occurring crystal structures. To maximise the impact of these data, the entire database is being made available, without restrictions, at www.oqmd.org/download . In this paper, we outline the structure and contents of the database, and then use it to evaluate the accuracy of the calculations therein by comparing DFT predictions with experimental measurements for the stability of all elemental ground-state structures and 1,670 experimental formation energies of compounds. This represents the largest comparison between DFT and experimental formation energies to date. The apparent mean absolute error between experimental measurements and our calculations is 0.096 eV/atom. In order to estimate how much error to attribute to the DFT calculations, we also examine deviation between different experimental measurements themselves where multiple sources are available, and find a surprisingly large mean absolute error of 0.082 eV/atom. Hence, we suggest that a significant fraction of the error between DFT and experimental formation energies may be attributed to experimental uncertainties. Finally, we evaluate the stability of compounds in the OQMD (including compounds obtained from the ICSD as well as hypothetical structures), which allows us to predict the existence of ~3,200 new compounds that have not been experimentally characterised and uncover trends in material discovery, based on historical data available within the ICSD.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 4Использованных источников: 0