Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

SLIC Superpixels Compared to State-of-the-Art Superpixel Methods

Radhakrishna AchantaSchool of Computer and Communication Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland. [email protected]Anil ShajiImages and Visual Representation Group, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandKevin SmithZurich Light Microscopy Center, ETH Zurich, Zurich, SwitzerlandAurélien LucchiComputer Vision Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandPascal FuaComputer Vision Laboratory, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, SwitzerlandSabine SüsstrunkEcole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne, Lausanne
2012en
ABI

Аннотация

Computer vision applications have come to rely increasingly on superpixels in recent years, but it is not always clear what constitutes a good superpixel algorithm. In an effort to understand the benefits and drawbacks of existing methods, we empirically compare five state-of-the-art superpixel algorithms for their ability to adhere to image boundaries, speed, memory efficiency, and their impact on segmentation performance. We then introduce a new superpixel algorithm, simple linear iterative clustering (SLIC), which adapts a k-means clustering approach to efficiently generate superpixels. Despite its simplicity, SLIC adheres to boundaries as well as or better than previous methods. At the same time, it is faster and more memory efficient, improves segmentation performance, and is straightforward to extend to supervoxel generation.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0