Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Bone graft substitutes

Cato T. LaurencinUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Biomedical Engineering & Chemical Engineering, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. [email protected]Yusuf KhanUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics & Biomedical EngineeringHospital Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. [email protected]Saadiq F. El‐AminUniversity of Virginia School of Medicine, 400 Ray C Hunt Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. [email protected]
2005en
ABI

Аннотация

The current gold standard of bone grafts is the autograft since it possesses all the characteristics necessary for new bone growth, namely osteoconductivity, osteogenicity and osteoinductivity. However, the autograft has its limitations, including donor-site morbidity and supply limitations, hindering this as an option for bone repair. An extensive list of currently available alternatives to bone grafts is provided, along with a classification scheme that divides these bone graft substitutes into five groups depending on the primary material composition: allograft, cell, factor, ceramic and polymer. Of the bone graft substitutes listed, several are discussed in detail. Beyond the current state of the art, attention is paid to what lies ahead in the field of bone graft substitutes. Biodegradable composite structures and various new architectures are discussed, as are newly developed polymeric materials, with tissue engineering providing the platform for future directions within this discipline.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0