Статья

<i>Salvia</i> united: The greatest good for the greatest number

Bryan T. DrewDepartment of Biology University of Nebraska-Kearney Kearney, Nebraska 68849 U.S.AJesús Guadalupe González‐GallegosChun‐Lei XiangKey Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming, Yunnan 650201 ChinaRicardo KriebelDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 U.S.AChloe P. DrummondDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 U.S.AJay B. WalkedDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 U.S.AKenneth J. SytsmaDepartment of Botany University of Wisconsin Madison, Wisconsin 53706 U.S.A

2017en

ABI

Аннотация

Abstract Previous molecular phylogenetic research, based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA data, has demonstrated that the large genus Salvia (Lamiaceae) is paraphyletic as traditionally circumscribed. However, neither relationships within Salvia s.l. nor within subtribe Salviinae have been evaluated using low‐copy nuclear gene regions. Here, we use two low‐copy nuclear gene regions ( PPR‐AT3G09060, GBSSI ) to further assess relationships of Salvia and related genera within Salviinae. Our results largely confirm results from previous studies based on chloroplast and nuclear ribosomal DNA. Based upon the phylogenetic results presented here, previous phylogenetic studies, and taxonomic, morphological, and practical considerations, we conclude that the botanical community would be best served by maintaining a broadly defined Salvia, including the five small embedded genera Dorystaechas, Meriandra, Perovskia, Rosmarinus, and Zhumeria as Salvia species. We subsequently present an updated circumscription of Salvia.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

DOI: 10.12705/661.7

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 5Использованных источников: 0

Показатели — AkademScholar