Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Quality of radiotherapy services in post-Soviet countries: An IAEA survey

Eduardo RosenblattDiv. of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: [email protected]Elena FidarovaDiv. of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, AustriaSunita GhoshCancer Biostatistics, Univ. of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaEduardo ZubizarretaDiv. of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, AustriaOlga UnterkirhereDiv. of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, AustriaН. Г. СемикозV. SinaikaN.N. Alexandrov National Cancer Center of Belarus, Minsk, BelarusViktor KimKazakhstan Research Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Almaty, KazakhstanN. KaramyanI. IsayevNational Center of Oncology, Baku, AzerbaijanKamal AkbarovNational Center of Oncology, Baku, AzerbaijanDarejan LomidzeTbilisi State Medical University, HTMC, University Clinic, Tbilisi, GeorgiaOksana BondarevaNational Centre of Oncology, Bishkek, KyrgyzstanPiotr TuzlucovManzura ZardodkhonovaС. И. ТкачевM. KislyakovaAssociation of Medical Physicists in Russia, Russian FederationJamshid M AlimovNational Research Center of Oncology, Tashkent, UzbekistanTetiana PidlubnaMichael BartoňIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, UNSW, Sydney, AustraliaWilliam J. MackillopQueen's University, Division of Cancer Care & Epidemiology, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Radiotherapy and Oncologyjournal2018en
ABI

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: The quality of radiotherapy services in post-Soviet countries has not yet been studied following a formal methodology. The IAEA conducted a survey using two sets of validated radiation oncology quality indicators (ROIs). METHODS: Eleven post-Soviet countries were assessed. A coordinator was designated for each country and acted as the liaison between the country and the IAEA. The methodology was a one-time cross-sectional survey using a 58-question tool in Russian. The questionnaire was based on two validated sets of ROIs: for radiotherapy centres, the indicators proposed by Cionini et al., and for data at the country level, the Australasian ROIs. RESULTS: The overall response ratio was 66.3%, but for the Russian Federation, it was 24%. Data were updated on radiotherapy infrastructure and equipment. 256 radiotherapy centres are operating 275 linear accelerators and 337 Cobalt-60 units. 61% of teletherapy machines are older than ten years. Analysis of ROIs revealed significant differences between these countries and radiotherapy practices in the West. Naming, task profile and education programmes of radiotherapy professionals are different than in the West. CONCLUSIONS: Most countries need modernization of their radiotherapy infrastructure coupled with adequate staffing numbers and updated education programmes focusing on evidence-based medicine, quality, and safety.

Перевод пока недоступен

Темы

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники