A DNA barcode for land plants
CBOL Plant Working Group1Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Peter M. HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Laura L. ForrestRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;John L. SpougeNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Computational Biology Branch, Bethesda, MD 20894;Mehrdad HajibabaeiBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Sujeevan RatnasinghamBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Michelle van der BankDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Mark W. ChaseRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Robyn S. CowanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;David L. EricksonDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 20013-7012;Aron J. FazekasDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Sean W. GrahamUBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;Karen E. JamesBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Ki-Joong KimSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;W. John KressDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, 20013-7012;Harald SchneiderBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Jonathan Van Alphen-StahlRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Spencer C. H. BarrettDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3B2;Cássio van den BergLaboratório de Sistemática Molecular de Plantas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, 44031-460, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil;Diego BogarínJardín Botánico Lankester, Universidad de Costa Rica, Cartago, Costa Rica;Kevin S. BurgessDepartment of Biology, Columbus State University, Columbus, GA 31907-5645;Kenneth M. CameronDepartment of Botany, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53508;Mark A. CarineBotany Department, Natural History Museum, London SW7 5BD, United Kingdom;Juliana ChacónUniversidad de los Andes, Apartado Aéreo 4976, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia;Alexandra ClarkRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;James J. ClarksonRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;Ferozah ConradLeslie Hill Molecular Systematics Laboratory, SANBI, Kirstenbosch Research Centre, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa;Dion S. DeveyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond TW9 3DS, United Kingdom;C. S. FordInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, United Kingdom;Terry A. HeddersonDepartment of Botany, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa;Michelle L. HollingsworthRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Brian C. HusbandDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Laura J. KellyRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Prasad KesanakurtiDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Jung Sung KimSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;Young‐Dong KimDepartment of Life Sciences, Hallym University, Chuncheon 200-702, Korea;Renaud LahayeDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Hae-Lim LeeSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;David G. LongRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Santiago MadriñánUniversidad de los Andes, Apartado Aéreo 4976, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia;Olivier MaurinDepartment of Botany and Plant Biotechnology, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg 2006, South Africa;Isabelle MeusnierBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Steven G. NewmasterDepartment of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1;Chong-Wook ParkSchool of Biological Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul 151-742, Korea;Diana M. PercyUBC Botanical Garden and Centre for Plant Research, Faculty of Land and Food Systems, and Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4;Gitte PetersenNatural History Museum AarhusJames RichardsonRoyal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, United Kingdom;Gerardo A. SalazarInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 México, D.F., Mexico;Vincent SavolainenImperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot SL5 7PY, United Kingdom; andOle SebergNatural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, 1307 Copenhagen K, Denmark;M. J. WilkinsonInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, United Kingdom;Dong‐Keun YiSchool of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University, Seoul 136-701, Korea;Damon P. LittleCullman Program for Molecular Systematics, New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY, 10458-5126
2009en
ABI
Аннотация
DNA barcoding involves sequencing a standard region of DNA as a tool for species identification. However, there has been no agreement on which region(s) should be used for barcoding land plants. To provide a community recommendation on a standard plant barcode, we have compared the performance of 7 leading candidate plastid DNA regions (atpF-atpH spacer, matK gene, rbcL gene, rpoB gene, rpoC1 gene, psbK-psbI spacer, and trnH-psbA spacer). Based on assessments of recoverability, sequence quality, and levels of species discrimination, we recommend the 2-locus combination of rbcL+matK as the plant barcode. This core 2-locus barcode will provide a universal framework for the routine use of DNA sequence data to identify specimens and contribute toward the discovery of overlooked species of land plants.
Перевод пока недоступен
Идентификаторы
Цитирования и источники
Цитирований: 5Использованных источников: 0