Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

Nathalie Percie du SertNC3Rs, London, United KingdomViki HurstNC3Rs, London, United KingdomAmrita AhluwaliaBarts Cardiovascular CTU, Queen Mary University of London, London, United KingdomSabina AlamTaylor & Francis Group, London, United KingdomMarc T. AveyHealth Science Practice, ICF, Durham, North Carolina, United States of AmericaMonya BakerNature, San Francisco, California, United States of AmericaWilliam J. BrowneSchool of Education, University of Bristol, Bristol, United KingdomAlejandra ClarkPLOS ONE, Cambridge, United KingdomInnes C. CuthillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United KingdomUlrich DirnaglQUEST Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health & Department of Experimental Neurology, Charite Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, GermanyMichael EmersonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United KingdomPaul GarnerCentre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Clinical Sciences Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United KingdomStephen T. HolgateClinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United KingdomDavid W. HowellsTasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, AustraliaNatasha A. KarpData Sciences & Quantitative Biology, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, United KingdomStanley E. LazicPrioris.ai Inc, Ottawa, CanadaKatie LidsterNC3Rs, London, United KingdomCatriona MacCallumHindawi Ltd, London, United KingdomMalcolm MacleodCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomEsther J. PearlNC3Rs, London, United KingdomOle H. PetersenAcademia Europaea Knowledge Hub, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United KingdomFrances RawleMedical Research Council, London, United KingdomPenny S. ReynoldsStatistics in Anesthesiology Research (STAR) Core, Department of Anesthesiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of AmericaKieron RooneyDiscipline of Exercise and Sport Science, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, AustraliaEmily S. SenaCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United KingdomShai D. SilberbergNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of AmericaThomas StecklerJanssen Pharmaceutica NV, Beerse, BelgiumHanno WürbelVeterinary Public Health Institute, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Reproducible science requires transparent reporting. The ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) were originally developed in 2010 to improve the reporting of animal research. They consist of a checklist of information to include in publications describing in vivo experiments to enable others to scrutinise the work adequately, evaluate its methodological rigour, and reproduce the methods and results. Despite considerable levels of endorsement by funders and journals over the years, adherence to the guidelines has been inconsistent, and the anticipated improvements in the quality of reporting in animal research publications have not been achieved. Here, we introduce ARRIVE 2.0. The guidelines have been updated and information reorganised to facilitate their use in practice. We used a Delphi exercise to prioritise and divide the items of the guidelines into 2 sets, the "ARRIVE Essential 10," which constitutes the minimum requirement, and the "Recommended Set," which describes the research context. This division facilitates improved reporting of animal research by supporting a stepwise approach to implementation. This helps journal editors and reviewers verify that the most important items are being reported in manuscripts. We have also developed the accompanying Explanation and Elaboration (E&E) document, which serves (1) to explain the rationale behind each item in the guidelines, (2) to clarify key concepts, and (3) to provide illustrative examples. We aim, through these changes, to help ensure that researchers, reviewers, and journal editors are better equipped to improve the rigour and transparency of the scientific process and thus reproducibility.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0