Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

A Real-world Evaluation of a Case-based Reasoning Algorithm to Support Antimicrobial Prescribing Decisions in Acute Care

Timothy M. RawsonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United KingdomBernard HernandezDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United KingdomLuke MooreChelsea & Westminster NHS Foundation Trust, London, United KingdomPau HerreroDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United KingdomEsmita CharaniNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United KingdomDamien MingNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United KingdomRichard WilsonImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United KingdomOliver BlandyNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United KingdomShiranee SriskandanNational Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Campus, London, United KingdomMark GilchristImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United KingdomC. ToumazouDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United KingdomPantelis GeorgiouDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London, United KingdomAlison HolmesImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: A locally developed case-based reasoning (CBR) algorithm, designed to augment antimicrobial prescribing in secondary care was evaluated. METHODS: Prescribing recommendations made by a CBR algorithm were compared to decisions made by physicians in clinical practice. Comparisons were examined in 2 patient populations: first, in patients with confirmed Escherichia coli blood stream infections ("E. coli patients"), and second in ward-based patients presenting with a range of potential infections ("ward patients"). Prescribing recommendations were compared against the Antimicrobial Spectrum Index (ASI) and the World Health Organization Essential Medicine List Access, Watch, Reserve (AWaRe) classification system. Appropriateness of a prescription was defined as the spectrum of the prescription covering the known or most-likely organism antimicrobial sensitivity profile. RESULTS: In total, 224 patients (145 E. coli patients and 79 ward patients) were included. Mean (standard deviation) age was 66 (18) years with 108/224 (48%) female sex. The CBR recommendations were appropriate in 202/224 (90%) compared to 186/224 (83%) in practice (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24 95% confidence interval [CI]: .392-3.936; P = .71). CBR recommendations had a smaller ASI compared to practice with a median (range) of 6 (0-13) compared to 8 (0-12) (P < .01). CBR recommendations were more likely to be classified as Access class antimicrobials compared to physicians' prescriptions at 110/224 (49%) vs. 79/224 (35%) (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.212-2.588; P < .01). Results were similar for E. coli and ward patients on subgroup analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A CBR-driven decision support system provided appropriate recommendations within a narrower spectrum compared to current clinical practice. Future work must investigate the impact of this intervention on prescribing behaviors more broadly and patient outcomes.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0