Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Key Biodiversity Areas as Site Conservation Targets

Güven Ekenworks at Plantlife International, Salisbury SP1 1DX, United KingdomLeon Bennunworks at Plantlife International, Salisbury SP1 1DX, United KingdomThomas M. Brookswith CABS, CI, Bogotá, ColombiaWill DarwallCenter for Applied Biodiversity Science (CABS), Conser-vation International (CI), Washington, DC 20036Lincoln FishpoolBirdLife International, Asia Division, Tokyo 160-0022, JapanMatt FosterBirdLife International, Asia Division, Tokyo 160-0022, JapanDavid KnoxBirdLife Interna-tional, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands, and Doga Dernegi, PK 640 -06645, Yenisehir, Ankara, TurkeyPenny F. LanghammerIUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), Cambridge CB3 ODL, United Kingdom. Paul Matiku works at Nature Kenya, Nairobi 00100, KenyaPaul Matikuwith CABS, CI, Bogotá, ColombiaElizabeth A. Radfordare with BirdLife International, Cambridge CB3 0NA, United KingdomPaul SalamanBirdLife Interna-tional, NL-6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands, and Doga Dernegi, PK 640 -06645, Yenisehir, Ankara, TurkeyWes Sechrestwith CABS, CI, Bogotá, ColombiaMichael L. SmithIUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), Cambridge CB3 ODL, United Kingdom. Paul Matiku works at Nature Kenya, Nairobi 00100, KenyaSacha Spectorworks at Plantlife International, Salisbury SP1 1DX, United KingdomAndrew W. Tordoffare with BirdLife International, Cambridge CB3 0NA, United Kingdom
2004en
ABI

Аннотация

Site conservation is among the most effective means to reduce global biodiversity loss. Therefore, it is critical to identify those sites where unique biodiversity must be conserved immediately. To this end, the concept of key biodiversity areas (KBAs) has been developed, seeking to identify and, ultimately, ensure that networks of globally important sites are safeguarded. This methodology builds up from the identification of species conservation targets (through the IUCN Red List) and nests within larger-scale conservation approaches. Sites are selected using standardized, globally applicable, threshold-based criteria, driven by the distribution and population of species that require site-level conservation. The criteria address the two key issues for setting site conservation priorities: vulnerability and irreplaceability. We also propose quantitative thresholds for the identification of KBAs meeting each criterion, based on a review of existing approaches and ecological theory to date. However, these thresholds require extensive testing, especially in aquatic systems.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0