The Primacy of Society and the Failures of Law and Development

I. The Current State of Law and Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R II. Why “Law and Development” is Better Not Seen as a Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 220 R III. How the Connectedness of Law Bedevils Judicial Reform Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222 R IV. Law and Capitalism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 225 R V. The Progressive Law and Development Package . . . . . . . . . . . 232 R VI. The Law and Development Enterprise . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235 R VII. The Risks of Transplanting the Battle of Ideas . . . . . . . . . . . . 239 R VIII. “Law and Development” is Not Legal Development . . . . . . . 241 R IX. Moving Forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 244 R

Перевод пока недоступен