Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Wildlife population changes across Eastern Europe after the collapse of socialism

Eugenia BraginaSILVIS Lab Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WIAnthony R. IvesDepartment of Integrative Biology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WIAnna M. PidgeonSILVIS Lab Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WILinas BalčiauskasLaboratory of Mammalian Ecology Nature Research Centre Vilnius LithuaniaSándor CsányiSzent István University Institute for Wildlife Conservation Gödöllő HungaryPavlo KhoyetskyyNational University of Forestry of Ukraine Lviv UkraineKatarina KysuckáInstitute of Landscape Ecology SAS Nitra Slovak RepublicJuraj LieskovskýInstitute of Landscape Ecology SAS Nitra Slovak RepublicJānis OzoliņšLatvian State Forest Research Institute SILAVA Salaspils LatviaTiit RandveerEstonian University of Life Sciences Tartu EstoniaPřemysl ŠtychDepartment of Applied Geoinformatics and Cartography Faculty of Science Charles University in Prague Prague Czech RepublicAnatoliy VolokhTavria State Agrotechnological University Melitopol UkraineChavdar ZhelevNational Station for Wildlife Management, Biology and Game Diseases Executive Forest Agency Ministry of Agriculture and Foods Sofia BulgariaElżbieta ZiółkowskaDepartment of GIS, Cartography and Remote Sensing Institute of Geography and Spatial Management Jagiellonian University Kraków PolandVolker C. RadeloffSILVIS Lab Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology University of Wisconsin–Madison Madison WI
2018en
ABI

Аннотация

When political regimes fall, economic conditions change and wildlife protection can be undermined. Eastern European countries experienced turmoil following the collapse of socialism in the early 1990s, raising the question of how wildlife was affected. We show that the aftermath of the collapse changed the population growth rates of various wildlife taxa. We analyzed populations of moose ( Alces alces ), wild boar ( Sus scrofa ), red deer ( Cervus elaphus ), roe deer ( Capreolus capreolus ), brown bear ( Ursus arctos ), Eurasian lynx ( Lynx lynx ), and gray wolf ( Canis lupus ) in nine countries. Population growth rates changed in 32 out of 49 time series. In the countries that reformed slowly, many species exhibited rapid population declines, and population growth rates changed in 83% of the time series. In contrast, in countries with fast post‐socialism reforms, many populations increased rapidly, and growth rates changed in only 48% of time series. Our results suggest that the direction and frequency of the changes were associated with socioeconomic conditions, and that wildlife populations can be greatly affected by socioeconomic upheavals.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0