A Comparison of Granite-Related Tin, Tungsten, and Gold-Bismuth Deposits: Implications for Exploration

Research Article| April 01, 2005 A Comparison of Granite-Related Tin, Tungsten, and Gold-Bismuth Deposits: Implications for Exploration T. Baker; T. Baker (SEG 1996 F) †Corresponding author: e-mail, Timothy. [email protected]; Economic Geology Research Unit, School of Earth Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar P. J. Pollard; P. J. Pollard (SEG 1985 F) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar R. Mustard; R. Mustard (SEG 1999) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar G. Mark; G. Mark (SEG 1999) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar J. L. Graham J. L. Graham (SEG 2005 S) Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar SEG Discovery (2005) (61): 5–17. https://doi.org/10.5382/SEGnews.2005-61.fea Article history first online: 13 Sep 2021 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation T. Baker, P. J. Pollard, R. Mustard, G. Mark, J. L. Graham; A Comparison of Granite-Related Tin, Tungsten, and Gold-Bismuth Deposits: Implications for Exploration. SEG Discovery 2005;; (61): 5–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.5382/SEGnews.2005-61.fea Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentBy SocietySEG Discovery Search Advanced Search Granite-related Au deposits associated with Sn-W provinces have been the subject of extensive debate over the past five years, since Thompson et al. (1999) defined their broad characteristics. The majority of these arguments have centered upon comparisons between granite-related Au deposits and orogenic Au deposits, and in particular, on how the deposits differ (e.g., Sillitoe and Thompson, 1998; Groves et al., 2003). This discussion is ongoing but there is a growing body of evidence that many of these Au deposits, particularly those with a strong Au-Bi association (herein described as granite-related Au-Bi deposits), are indeed magmatic in origin.... You do not currently have access to this article.

Перевод пока недоступен