Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0

Ronald BoellaardDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, [email protected]Roberto C. Delgado BoltonDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The NetherlandsWim J.G. OyenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, FranceFrancesco GiammarileDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Municipal Hospital Karlsruhe Inc., Karlsruhe, GermanyKlaus TatschDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, GermanyW. EschnerDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The NetherlandsFred VerzijlbergenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSally F. BarringtonDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsLucy PikeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsWolfgang WeberDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, BelgiumSigrid StroobantsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsDominique DelbekeBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USAKevin DonohoeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsScott HolbrookDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsMichael M. GrahamDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGiorgio TestaneraDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, MI, ItalyOtto S. HoekstraDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging (Radiology) and Nuclear Medicine, San Pedro Hospital and Centre for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (CIBIR), University of La Rioja, Logroo, La Rioja, SpainJosée M. ZijlstraDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Den Bosch, The NetherlandsEric P. VisserDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lyon, Lyon, FranceC. HoekstraDepartment of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The NetherlandsJan PruimDepartment of Clinical Physics, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The NetherlandsAntoon T. M. WillemsenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsBertjan ArendsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsJörg KotzerkeDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsAndreas BockischDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsThomas Beyer. Bockisch Clinic for Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, GermanyArturo ChitiDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsBernd J. KrauseCentre for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
2014en
ABI

Аннотация

The purpose of these guidelines is to assist physicians in recommending, performing, interpreting and reporting the results of FDG PET/CT for oncological imaging of adult patients. PET is a quantitative imaging technique and therefore requires a common quality control (QC)/quality assurance (QA) procedure to maintain the accuracy and precision of quantitation. Repeatability and reproducibility are two essential requirements for any quantitative measurement and/or imaging biomarker. Repeatability relates to the uncertainty in obtaining the same result in the same patient when he or she is examined more than once on the same system. However, imaging biomarkers should also have adequate reproducibility, i.e. the ability to yield the same result in the same patient when that patient is examined on different systems and at different imaging sites. Adequate repeatability and reproducibility are essential for the clinical management of patients and the use of FDG PET/CT within multicentre trials. A common standardised imaging procedure will help promote the appropriate use of FDG PET/CT imaging and increase the value of publications and, therefore, their contribution to evidence-based medicine. Moreover, consistency in numerical values between platforms and institutes that acquire the data will potentially enhance the role of semiquantitative and quantitative image interpretation. Precision and accuracy are additionally important as FDG PET/CT is used to evaluate tumour response as well as for diagnosis, prognosis and staging. Therefore both the previous and these new guidelines specifically aim to achieve standardised uptake value harmonisation in multicentre settings.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0