Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Low‐Temperature Opacities

Jason W. FergusonDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032D. R. AlexanderDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032F. AllardÉcole Normale Supérieure, CRAL, 46 Allée d’Italie, F-69364 Lyon Cedex 7, FranceTravis BarmanDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032J. BodnarikDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032Peter H. HauschildtHamburger Sternwarte, Gojenbergsweg 112, D-21029 Hamburg, GermanyAmanda Heffner‐WongDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032Akemi TamanaiDepartment of Physics, Wichita State University, Wichita, KS 67260-0032
2005en
ABI

Аннотация

Previous computations of low temperature Rosseland and Planck mean opacities from Alexander & Ferguson (1994) are updated and expanded. The new computations include a more complete equation of state with more grain species and updated optical constants. Grains are now explicitly included in thermal equilibrium in the equation of state calculation, which allows for a much wider range of grain compositions to be accurately included than was previously the case. The inclusion of high temperature condensates such as Al$_2$O$_3$ and CaTiO$_3$ significantly affects the total opacity over a narrow range of temperatures before the appearance of the first silicate grains. The new opacity tables are tabulated for temperatures ranging from 30000 K to 500 K with gas densities from 10$^{-4}$ g cm$^{-3}$ to 10$^{-19}$ g cm$^{-3}$. Comparisons with previous Rosseland mean opacity calculations are discussed. At high temperatures, the agreement with OPAL and Opacity Project is quite good. Comparisons at lower temperatures are more divergent as a result of differences in molecular and grain physics included in different calculations. The computation of Planck mean opacities performed with the opacity sampling method are shown to require a very large number of opacity sampling wavelength points; previously published results obtained with fewer wavelength points are shown to be significantly in error. Methods for requesting or obtaining the new tables are provided.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0