Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

A Prospective, Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of Implant Treatment in Women with Osteoporosis/Osteopenia: 5-Year Results

Andy TemmermanSection of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumLars RasmussonDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, SwedenAlexander KüblerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Plastic Surgery, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyAndreas ThorDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Institute of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, SwedenJoe MerhebSection of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumMarc QuirynenSection of Periodontology, Department of Oral Health Sciences, KU Leuven & Dentistry, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
2018en
ABI

Аннотация

The impact of osteoporosis on implant treatment is still a matter of debate in the scientific community, as it may possibly lead to higher failure rates. As long-term controlled trials are missing, the aim of this study was to verify the long-term outcome of implants placed in patients with systemic osteoporosis. Postmenopausal women in need of implants underwent bone mineral density measurements in hip and spine, using dual X-ray absorptiometry scans. Based on T-scores, they were divided into 2 groups: group O (osteoporosis group) with a T-score ≤-2 or group C (control group) with a T-score of ≥-1. Implants were placed in a 2-stage manner and loaded 4 to 8 wk after abutment surgery. Six months after loading and thereafter yearly, clinical and radiographical parameters were assessed. In total, 148 implants were placed in 48 patients (mean age: 67 y [range, 59-83]). Sixty-three implants were placed in 20 patients (group O) and 85 implants in 28 patients (group C). After 5 y, 117 implants (38 in group O and 79 in the group C) in 37 patients were assessed. Cumulative survival rate on an implant level was 96.5% (group O: 91.5%; group C: 100.0% [ P < 0.05]) and 95.7% (group O: 89.2%; group C: 100.0% [ P > 0.05]) on a patient level. The overall marginal bone-level alterations, after 5 y of loading, were -0.09 ± 0.78 mm (group O: -0.15 ± 0.50 mm; group C: -0.06 ± 0.89 mm) on an implant level and -0.09 ± 0.54 mm (group O: -0.18 ± 0.43 mm; group C: 0.06 ± 0.58 mm) on a patient level ( P > 0.05). Oral implant therapy in osteoporotic patients is a reliable treatment option with comparable osseointegration rates, implant survival, and marginal bone-level alterations after 5 y of functional loading (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00745121).

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0