Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Development of new therapeutic options for the treatment of uveal melanoma

Janney Z. WangFaculty of Medicine and Health Sydney Pharmacy School The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaVivian LinFaculty of Medicine The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW AustraliaElsa ToumiFaculty of Medicine The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW AustraliaKe WangKey Laboratory of Nuclear Medicine Ministry of Health Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Molecular Nuclear Medicine Jiangsu Institute of Nuclear Medicine Wuxi ChinaHong ZhuZhejiang Province Key Laboratory of Anti‐Cancer Drug Research College of Pharmaceutical Sciences Zhejiang University Hangzhou ChinaRobert M. ConwayOcular Oncology Unit Sydney Eye Hospital and The Kinghorn Cancer Centre NSW AustraliaMichele C. MadiganSave Sight Institute The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaMichael T. MurrayDiscipline of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine and Health The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaSvetlana CherepanoffSydPath Department of Anatomical Pathology St Vincent's Hospital Darlinghurst NSW AustraliaFanfan ZhouFaculty of Medicine and Health Sydney Pharmacy School The University of Sydney NSW AustraliaWenying ShuDepartment of Pharmacy Affiliated Cancer Hospital & Institute of Guangzhou Medical University China
2021en
ABI

Аннотация

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Important cytogenetic and genetic risk factors for the development of UM include chromosome 3 monosomy, mutations in the guanine nucleotide-binding proteins GNAQ/GNA11, and loss of the BRACA1-associated protein 1 (BAP 1). Most primary UMs are treated conservatively with radiotherapy, but enucleation is necessary for large tumours. Despite the effectiveness of local control, up to 50% of UM patients develop metastasis for which there are no effective therapies. Attempts to utilise the targeted therapies that have been developed for the treatment of other cancers, including a range of signal transduction pathway inhibitors, have rarely produced significant outcomes in UM. Similarly, the application of immunotherapies that are effective in cutaneous melanoma to treat UM have also been disappointing. Other approaches that have been initiated involve proteasomal inhibitors and histone deacetylase inhibitors which are approved for the treatment of other cancers. Nevertheless, there have been occasional positive outcomes from these treatments in UM. Moreover, combination approaches in UM have also yielded some positive developments. It would be valuable to identify how to apply such therapies efficiently in UM, potentially via individualised tumour profiling. It would also be important to characterise UM tumours to differentiate the potential drivers of progression from those in other types of cancers. The recent identification of novel kinases and metastatic genes in UM tumours makes the development of new UM-specific treatments feasible.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0