GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Gordon GuyattDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5. [email protected]Andrew D OxmanNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, PO Box 7004, St Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayGunn Elisabeth VistNorwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, PO Box 7004, St Olavs Plass, 0130 Oslo, NorwayRegina KunzBasel Institute of Clinical Epidemiology, University Hospital Basel, Hebelstrasse 10, 4031 Basel, SwitzerlandYngve Falck–YtterDivision of Gastroenterology, Case Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USAPablo Alonso‐CoelloIberoamerican Cochrane Center, Servicio de Epidemiología Clínica y Salud Pública (Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona), Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona 08041, SpainHolger J. Schünemann
2008en
ABI
Аннотация
Guidelines are inconsistent in how they rate the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. This article explores the advantages of the GRADE system, which is increasingly being adopted by organisations worldwide
Перевод пока недоступен
Идентификаторы
Цитирования и источники
Цитирований: 4Использованных источников: 0