Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Physics of Eclipsing Binaries. V. General Framework for Solving the Inverse Problem

Kyle E. ConroyDepartment of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Villanova University, 800 East Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected]A. KochoskaDepartment of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Villanova University, 800 East Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected]Daniel HeySchool of Physics, Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA) The University of Sydney, NSW 2006, AustraliaHerbert PabloAmerican Association of Variable Star Observers, 49 Bay State Road, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAK. HambletonDepartment of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Villanova University, 800 East Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected]David JonesDepartamento de Astrofísica, Universidad de La Laguna, E-38206 La Laguna, Tenerife, SpainJoseph GiammarcoEastern University, Dept. of Astronomy and Physics, 1300 Eagle Rd, St. Davids, PA 19087, USAM. Abdul-MasihInstitute of Astronomy, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200 D, B-3001, Leuven, BelgiumA. PršaDepartment of Astrophysics and Planetary Science, Villanova University, 800 East Lancaster Avenue, Villanova, PA 19085, USA; [email protected]
2020en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract PHOEBE 2 is a Python package for modeling the observables of eclipsing star systems, but until now it has focused entirely on the forward model—that is, generating a synthetic model given fixed values of a large number of parameters describing the system and the observations. The inverse problem, obtaining orbital and stellar parameters given observational data, is more complicated and computationally expensive as it requires generating a large set of forward models to determine which set of parameters and uncertainties best represents the available observational data. The process of determining the best solution and also of obtaining reliable and robust uncertainties on those parameters often requires the use of multiple algorithms, including both optimizers and samplers. Furthermore, the forward model of PHOEBE has been designed to be as physically robust as possible, but it is computationally expensive compared to other codes. It is useful, therefore, to use whichever code is most efficient given the reasonable assumptions for a specific system, but learning the intricacies of multiple codes presents a barrier to doing this in practice. Here we present release 2.3 of PHOEBE (publicly available from http://phoebe-project.org ), which introduces a general framework for defining and handling distributions on parameters and utilizing multiple different estimation, optimization, and sampling algorithms. The presented framework supports multiple forward models, including the robust model built into PHOEBE itself.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 3Использованных источников: 0