Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

A novel protocol for assessing aquatic pollution, based on the feeding inhibition of Daphnia magna

Anikó KovácsDepartment of Limnology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10., P.O.B. 158, 8200, Veszprém, HungaryN.-A. Abdel-HameidDepartment of Limnology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10., P.O.B. 158, 8200, Veszprém, HungaryAndrás ÁcsDepartment of Limnology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10., P.O.B. 158, 8200, Veszprém, HungaryÁrpád FerinczDepartment of Limnology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10., P.O.B. 158, 8200, Veszprém, HungaryNóra KovátsDepartment of Limnology, University of Pannonia, Egyetem u. 10., P.O.B. 158, 8200, Veszprém, Hungary
2012en
ABI

Аннотация

In this study, sensitivity of a novel acute bioassay based on the feeding activity of Daphnia magna was assessed, using 2 and 4 h of exposure. For calibration purposes, results were compared with those of the standard immobility test as described by the ISO 6341:1996 standard. Using potassium dichromate as the reference chemical, after 4 h of exposure the proposed protocol showed similar sensitivity in comparison with the standard, as the EC50 of the immobility test was 1.093 ± 0.098 mg·L–1, whereas the EC50 of the feeding inhibition bioassay was 1.742 ± 0.133 mg·L–1. In order to test the sensitivity of the bioassay, toxicity of two other contaminants, copper and wastewater, was estimated and the results were compared with those of the standard immobility test. For both cases, the feeding inhibition test showed higher sensitivity, as in the case of copper the EC50s were 0.0952 ± 0.0087 and 0.0753 ± 0.0152 mg·L–1, whilst the EC50 recorded for the 24-h immobility test was 0.2407 ± 0.0159 mg·L–1. In the case of the effluent, EC50 values after 2 and 4 h of exposure were 15.698 ± 2.681 and 12.557 ± 2.358 expressed as % of the wastewater, respectively, whereas the EC50 of the immobility test was calculated to be 36.4688 ± 5.4887.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0