Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Assessing the performance of recent density functionals for bulk solids

Gábor I. CsonkaDepartment of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, H-1521 Budapest, HungaryJohn P. PerdewDepartment of Physics and Quantum Theory Group, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USAAdrienn RuzsinszkyDepartment of Physics and Quantum Theory Group, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana 70118, USAPier PhilipsenScientific Computing and Modelling NV, Theoretical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The NetherlandsSébastien Lebègue∥CRM2, UMR 7036, Institut Jean Barriol, Nancy-University and CNRS, Boîte Postale 239, F-54506 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, FranceJoachim PaierFaculty of Physics, Center for Computational Materials Science, Universität Wien, Sensengasse 8/12, A-1090 Wien, AustriaOleg A. VydrovDepartment of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USAJános G. ÁngyánCRM2, UMR 7036, Institut Jean Barriol, Nancy-University and CNRS, Boîte Postale 239, F-54506 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
2009en
ABI

Аннотация

We assess the performance of recent density functionals for the exchange-correlation energy of a nonmolecular solid, by applying accurate calculations with the GAUSSIAN, BAND, and VASP codes to a test set of 24 solid metals and nonmetals. The functionals tested are the modified Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof generalized gradient approximation (PBEsol GGA), the second-order GGA (SOGGA), and the Armiento-Mattsson 2005 (AM05) GGA. For completeness, we also test more standard functionals: the local density approximation, the original PBE GGA, and the Tao-Perdew-Staroverov-Scuseria meta-GGA. We find that the recent density functionals for solids reach a high accuracy for bulk properties (lattice constant and bulk modulus). For the cohesive energy, PBE is better than PBEsol overall, as expected, but PBEsol is actually better for the alkali metals and alkali halides. For fair comparison of calculated and experimental results, we consider the zero-point phonon and finite-temperature effects ignored by many workers. We show how GAUSSIAN basis sets and inaccurate experimental reference data may affect the rating of the quality of the functionals. The results show that PBEsol and AM05 perform somewhat differently from each other for alkali metal, alkaline-earth metal, and alkali halide crystals (where the maximum value of the reduced density gradient is about 2), but perform very similarly for most of the other solids (where it is often about 1). Our explanation for this is consistent with the importance of exchange-correlation nonlocality in regions of core-valence overlap.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0