Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Usefulness of carotid plaque (sum and maximum of plaque thickness) in combination with intima‐media thickness for the detection of coronary artery disease in asymptomatic patients with diabetes

Shoichi AkazawaCenter of Diabetes and Endocrinology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanMasayuki TojikuboCenter of Diabetes and Endocrinology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanYuko NakanoCenter of Diabetes and Endocrinology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanSatoe NakamuraCenter of Diabetes and Endocrinology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanH. TamaiCenter of Diabetes and Endocrinology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanKoji YonemotoBiostatistics Center Kurume University Kurume City Fukuoka JapanEiji SadasimaLaboratory Center Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanTomohiro KawasakiDepartment of Cardiology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka JapanNobuhiko KogaDepartment of Cardiology Shin‐Koga Hospital Kurume City Fukuoka Japan
2015en
ABI

Аннотация

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of markers of carotid plaque, such as sum (PS) and maximum (P-max) of the plaque thickness, in combination with intima-media thickness in the common carotid artery (CIMT) for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) was investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes without known CAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: B-mode ultrasonographic scanning of the carotid artery and multislice computed tomography coronary angiography were carried out in 332 asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes. RESULTS: For the presence of obstructive CAD when incorporating PS or P-max to standard risk factors in a multiple logistic regression model, the classification ability in PS and P-max increased greatly (area under the curve [AUC] 0.827 vs 0.720 [net reclassification index {NRI} = 0.652, P < 0.01] and AUC 0.820 vs 0.720 [NRI = 0.775, P < 0.01], respectively), and it in CIMT increased slightly (AUC 0.740 vs 0.720, NRI = 0.230, P = 0.041). Furthermore, the classification abilities for a model with interaction terms between PS* or P-max* and CIMT were statistically larger than those for a model without interaction terms (AUC 0.833 vs 0.827 [NRI = 0.411, P < 0.01] and 0.823 vs 0.820 [NRI = 0.269, P < 0.05], respectively). Partitioning showed the patients in the values of the PS <2.6 mm and CIMT <0.725 mm (100%), or in P-max <2.1 mm and CIMT <0.725 mm (95.4%), did not have obstructive CAD, whereas those in the values of PS ≧2.6 mm, presence of hyperlipidemia and CIMT ≧0.675 mm (84%) or those in the value of P-max ≧2.1 mm and body mass index ≧24 (91.7%) had obstructive CAD. CONCLUSIONS: Although the P-max and PS in the carotid artery were useful as detectors of CAD, combining them with CIMT provided a much superior first-line screening method in detecting CAD in asymptomatic patients with diabetes.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0