Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Reviews and syntheses: Turning the challenges of partitioning ecosystem evaporation and transpiration into opportunities

Paul C. StoyDepartment of Biological Systems Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USATarek S. El‐MadanyMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans Knöll Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GermanyJoshua B. FisherJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109, USAPierre GentineDepartment of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USATobias GerkenThe Pennsylvania State University, Department of Meteorology and Atmospheric Science, 503 Walker Building, University Park, PA, USAStephen P. GoodDepartment of Biological & Ecological Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USAAnne KlosterhalfenAgrosphere Institute, IBG-3, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425 Jülich, GermanyShuguang LiuNational Engineering Laboratory for Applied Technology of Forestry and Ecology in South China, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha, ChinaDiego G. MirallesLaboratory of Hydrology and Water Management, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, BelgiumÓscar Pérez‐PriegoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW 2109, AustraliaA. J. RigdenDepartment of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USATodd H. SkaggsU.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USAGeorg WohlfahrtInstitut für Ökologie, Universität Innsbruck, Sternwartestr. 15, 6020 Innsbruck, AustriaRay G. AndersonU.S. Salinity Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Riverside, CA, USAMiriam Coenders‐GerritsWater Resources Section, Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, 2628 CN Delft, the NetherlandsMartin JungMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans Knöll Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GermanyWouter H. MaesLaboratory of Hydrology and Water Management, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Gent, BelgiumIvan MammarellaInstitute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, 00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, FinlandMatthias MauderKarlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research – Atmospheric Environmental Research, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, GermanyMirco MigliavaccaMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans Knöll Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GermanyJacob A. NelsonMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans Knöll Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GermanyRafael PoyatosCREAF, E08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Catalonia, SpainMarkus ReichsteinMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Hans Knöll Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GermanyRussell L. ScottSouthwest Watershed Research Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Tucson, AZ, USASebastian WolfDepartment of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
2019en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract. Evaporation (E) and transpiration (T) respond differently to ongoing changes in climate, atmospheric composition, and land use. It is difficult to partition ecosystem-scale evapotranspiration (ET) measurements into E and T, which makes it difficult to validate satellite data and land surface models. Here, we review current progress in partitioning E and T and provide a prospectus for how to improve theory and observations going forward. Recent advancements in analytical techniques create new opportunities for partitioning E and T at the ecosystem scale, but their assumptions have yet to be fully tested. For example, many approaches to partition E and T rely on the notion that plant canopy conductance and ecosystem water use efficiency exhibit optimal responses to atmospheric vapor pressure deficit (D). We use observations from 240 eddy covariance flux towers to demonstrate that optimal ecosystem response to D is a reasonable assumption, in agreement with recent studies, but more analysis is necessary to determine the conditions for which this assumption holds. Another critical assumption for many partitioning approaches is that ET can be approximated as T during ideal transpiring conditions, which has been challenged by observational studies. We demonstrate that T can exceed 95 % of ET from certain ecosystems, but other ecosystems do not appear to reach this value, which suggests that this assumption is ecosystem-dependent with implications for partitioning. It is important to further improve approaches for partitioning E and T, yet few multi-method comparisons have been undertaken to date. Advances in our understanding of carbon–water coupling at the stomatal, leaf, and canopy level open new perspectives on how to quantify T via its strong coupling with photosynthesis. Photosynthesis can be constrained at the ecosystem and global scales with emerging data sources including solar-induced fluorescence, carbonyl sulfide flux measurements, thermography, and more. Such comparisons would improve our mechanistic understanding of ecosystem water fluxes and provide the observations necessary to validate remote sensing algorithms and land surface models to understand the changing global water cycle.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0