Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Evaluation, Treatment, and Prevention of Vitamin D Deficiency: an Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline

Michael F. HolickBoston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118, USANeil BinkleyUniversity of Wisconsin (N.C.B.), Madison, Wisconsin 53706Heike A. Bischoff‐FerrariUniversity Hospital Zurich (H.A.B.-F.), CH-8091 Zurich, SwitzerlandCatherine M. GordonChildren's Hospital Boston (C.M.G.), Boston, Massachusetts 02115David A. HanleyUniversity of Calgary Faculty of Medicine (D.A.H.), Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4Robert P. HeaneyCreighton University (R.P.H.), Omaha, Nebraska 68178M. Hassan MuradMayo Clinic (M.H.M.), Rochester, Minnesota 55905Connie M. WeaverPurdue University (C.M.W.), West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
2011en
ABI

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to provide guidelines to clinicians for the evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency with an emphasis on the care of patients who are at risk for deficiency. PARTICIPANTS: The Task Force was composed of a Chair, six additional experts, and a methodologist. The Task Force received no corporate funding or remuneration. CONSENSUS PROCESS: Consensus was guided by systematic reviews of evidence and discussions during several conference calls and e-mail communications. The draft prepared by the Task Force was reviewed successively by The Endocrine Society's Clinical Guidelines Subcommittee, Clinical Affairs Core Committee, and cosponsoring associations, and it was posted on The Endocrine Society web site for member review. At each stage of review, the Task Force received written comments and incorporated needed changes. CONCLUSIONS: Considering that vitamin D deficiency is very common in all age groups and that few foods contain vitamin D, the Task Force recommended supplementation at suggested daily intake and tolerable upper limit levels, depending on age and clinical circumstances. The Task Force also suggested the measurement of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level by a reliable assay as the initial diagnostic test in patients at risk for deficiency. Treatment with either vitamin D(2) or vitamin D(3) was recommended for deficient patients. At the present time, there is not sufficient evidence to recommend screening individuals who are not at risk for deficiency or to prescribe vitamin D to attain the noncalcemic benefit for cardiovascular protection.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0