Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Обзорная статья

Developing a teacher identity in the university context: a systematic review of the literature

Thea van LankveldResearch in Education, LEARN!, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsJudith SchoonenboomDepartment of Education, University of Vienna, Vienna, AustriaMonique VolmanResearch Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGerda CroisetResearch in Education, LEARN!, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsJ.J. Beishuizen
2016en
ABI

Аннотация

<div><div><p>This literature review summarises the growing body of literature discussing teacher identities of university teachers. The aim was to understand what strengthens or constrains the development of a teacher identity. A qualitative synthesis of 59 studies was carried out. The review showed that several factors contribute to the development of teacher identity. While contact with students and staff development programmes were experienced as strengthening teacher identity, the wider context of higher education was experienced as having a constraining effect. Furthermore, the impact of the direct work environment was experienced as either strengthening or constraining, depending on whether or not teaching is valued in the department. Five psychological processes were found to be involved in the development of a teacher identity: a sense of appreciation, a sense of connectedness, a sense of competence, a sense of commitment, and imagining a future career trajectory. The findings suggest that developing a teacher identity in the higher education context is not a smooth process. In order to empower university teachers, it is important to reward teaching excellence and build community. Staff development activities can play a role in helping teachers to develop strategies for gaining confidence and taking active control of their work situation, both individually and collectively. The authors argue that more attention should be paid to the implicit messages that departments convey to their teaching faculty.</p></div></div>

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0