Перейти к основному содержанию
AkademIndex

Продукты

Для разработчиков

AkademBaseОткрытый API экосистемы
Статья

Hybrid Biomass and Natural Gas Combined Cycles: Performance and Economic Analysis

Suleiman Ibrahim MohammadElectronic Marketing and Social Media Economic and Administrative Sciences, Zarqa University JordanAsokan VasudevanFaculty of Business and Communications INTI International University Negeri Sembilan MalaysiaMarwea Al‐hedrewyCollege of Technical Engineering the Islamic University Najaf IraqMustafa AbdullahElectric Vehicles Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research Al‐Ahliyya Amman University Amman JordanSuhas BallalDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry School of Sciences JAIN (Deemed to be University) Bangalore Karnataka IndiaAbhayveer SinghCentre for Research Impact & Outcome Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Rajpura Punjab IndiaSS SinghDepartment of Electrical Electronics & Electric Vehicle Engineering NIMS Institute of Engineering & Technology NIMS University Jaipur Rajasthan IndiaSrinivasa Rao RapetiReza AlayiDepartment of mechanics, Ge.C. Islamic Azad University Germi Iran
2025en
ABI

Аннотация

ABSTRACT The performance of a cogeneration system is explored in this study by analyzing the impact of natural gas fuel and synthesis gas from renewable biomass sources. The hybrid drive system employs a combination of a gas‐powered internal combustion engine and a Stirling‐type alpha external combustion engine to maximize efficiency and performance. The system is compared to a similar cogeneration system using natural gas as a power source. Energy and economic perspectives are used to evaluate the systems. The results show that using synthesis gas as fuel in the internal combustion engine provides significant advantages in terms of energy and economics. Compared to natural gas, using synthesis gas can reduce primary energy consumption by 40.55%. Additionally, the proposed system using synthetic gas fuel shows a reduction of 83.98% in fuel consumption costs.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0