Статья

PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews

Melissa L. Rethlefsen[email protected], Executive Director and Professor, Health Sciences Library & Informatics Center, University of New MexicoShona Kirtley[email protected], Senior Research Information Specialist, UK EQUATOR Centre, Centre for Statistics in Medicine (CSM), Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Botnar Research Centre, Oxford, United KingdomSiw Waffenschmidt[email protected], Head of the Information Management Unit, Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care, Cologne, GermanyAna Patricia Ayala[email protected], Research Services Librarian, Gerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaDavid Moher[email protected], Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, General Campus, Centre for Practice Changing Research Building, Ottawa, ON, CanadaMatthew J. Page[email protected], Research Fellow, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaJonathan Koffel[email protected], Emerging Technology and Innovation Strategist, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MNPRISMA-S Group

2021en

ABI

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Literature searches underlie the foundations of systematic reviews and related review types. Yet, the literature searching component of systematic reviews and related review types is often poorly reported. Guidance for literature search reporting has been diverse and, in many cases, does not offer enough detail to authors who need more specific information about reporting search methods and information sources in a clear, reproducible way. This document presents the PRISMA-S (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses literature search extension) checklist, and explanation and elaboration. METHODS: The checklist was developed using a three-stage Delphi survey process, followed by a consensus conference and public review process. RESULTS: The final checklist includes sixteen reporting items, each of which is detailed with exemplar reporting and rationale. CONCLUSIONS: The intent of PRISMA-S is to complement the PRISMA Statement and its extensions by providing a checklist that could be used by interdisciplinary authors, editors, and peer reviewers to verify that each component of a search is completely reported and, therefore, reproducible.

Перевод пока недоступен

Идентификаторы

DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2021.962

Цитирования и источники

Цитирований: 2Использованных источников: 0

Показатели — AkademScholar