Improving the Use AND Methodology OF Graphic Programs in the Teaching OF Drawing Skills

Introduction: The article addresses the problems and shortcomings encountered in mastering the subjects of drawing and geometric drawing, and proposes overcoming them through the use of graphic programs to facilitate students' work with complex drawings. AutoCAD serves as an example of graphics software utilized in the study of these subjects. Aim: The aim is to facilitate the mastery of drawing and geometric drawing and to enhance imagination using graphic programs with the assistance of computer technologies. Materials and Methods: A corpus of 15 scientific articles was assembled to analyze the extent to which students can master the subject matter and technology under study, and to evaluate the influence of ease and difficulties in mastering this subject matter post-instruction. The corpus consists of 5 articles addressing problems arising from the use of modern technologies and 10 articles discussing the advantages of using graphic programs. These articles were published in International and national academic journals between 2019 and 2023. They underwent analysis and a comparative study was conducted. Discussion and Results: The collected materials reveal the impact of using graphic symbols on learning outcomes. Scientific articles analyzing the advantages of teaching drawing with graphic programs demonstrate a higher level of engagement compared to articles focusing on the disadvantages of modern computer technology. In both cases, authors engage with the reader by referencing them and drawing upon general knowledge. However, articles related to computer graphics programs are more accessible to the reader than those focused on traditional drawing instruction, actively directing attention and directly addressing the reader through comments. Teaching drawing and geometric drawing with graphic programs using modern pedagogical technologies helped expand students' imagination and facilitated comprehensive knowledge acquisition. The primary distinction lies in direct appeals to the reader, conveyed through personal comments and questions. Conclusion: The research results have been widely cited in scientific articles of significant pedagogical value, with most demonstrating successful implementation of 3D modeling and varying levels of accuracy compared to traditional methods. The convenience of producing clear images and the enhanced ability to visualize and imagine are shown to be of great importance in teaching drawing, geometric drawing, and mechanical engineering. This, in turn, aids in the development and appropriate direction of global knowledge.

Перевод пока недоступен