Асосий контентга ўтиш
AkademIndex

Маҳсулотлар

Ишлаб чиқувчилар учун

AkademBaseЭкотизим учун очиқ API
Мақола

XGBoost Ensemble Algorithm for Classifying Tomato Leaf Diseases Based on Texture Descriptors

Alpamis KutlimuratovDepartment of Applied Informatics, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent 100121, UzbekistanBaxodir Saydullaevich AchilovDepartment of Computer Systems, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named After Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent 100084, UzbekistanKuanishbay SeitnazarovDepartment of General Education Disciplines and Distance Education, Nukus State Pedagogical Institute Named After Ajiniyaz, Nukus 100130, UzbekistanPiratdin AllayarovDepartment of Econometrics, Tashkent State University of Economics, Tashkent 100066, UzbekistanIslambek SaymanovApplied Mathematics and Intelligent Technologies Faculty, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent 100174, UzbekistanRashid OteniyazovDepartment of Computer Systems and Technologies, Nukus State Technical University, Nukus 100130, UzbekistanJamshid KhamzaevDepartment of Computer Systems, Tashkent University of Information Technologies Named After Muhammad Al-Khwarizmi, Tashkent 100084, Uzbekistan
AgriEngineeringjournal2026en
ABI

Аннотация

This article presents a simple and understandable approach to the automatic assessment of the severity of late blight on tomato leaves. We collect our own dataset of 5245 RGB images of healthy and diseased tomato leaves and determine five ordinal classes: healthy (0%) and four infection levels (0.1–10%, 11–25%, 26–50%, and ≥51% of the affected area). Each image is segmented using the global definition of the Otsu threshold, followed by morphological purification, after which seven textural and geometric characteristics are extracted from the contours of the lesion: contrast, number of contours, average and standard deviation of the contour area, average and standard deviation of the contour perimeter, and average area-to-perimeter ratio. All characteristics are normalized and used as input data for the XGBoost classifier. The dataset is randomly split into 80% training and 20% test images, resulting in an independent test set of 1049 images. In this test set, the proposed model provides an overall accuracy of 0.93 and an F1 macro score of 0.93 points, while for each F1 class, it varies from 0.90 to 0.97. The confusion matrix shows a stable difference between neighboring severity levels, while the analysis of the importance of the features confirms the relevance of contour descriptors for characterizing the size and shape of the lesion. This method only runs on a central processor, requires a small amount of memory, and outputs interpretable output data, making it suitable for use in greenhouses and farms with limited computing resources. We also discuss the limitations associated with the boundaries between neighboring classes and the potential shift in the subject area, and we outline directions for expanding the approach to multi-sheet scenes and explicit ordinal loss functions.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган

Мавзулар

Идентификаторлар

Иқтибослар ва манбалар

0 та иқтибос0 та фойдаланилган манба
Кўрсаткичлар — AkademScholar · Тез орада