Асосий контентга ўтиш
AkademIndex

Маҳсулотлар

Ишлаб чиқувчилар учун

AkademBaseЭкотизим учун очиқ API
Мақола

Observable-level consistency of M87* and Sgr A* from EHT ring diameters: A minimal forward model

Seif Al BustanjiFaculty of Technical Education, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, JordanHussein Aayd HusseinDepartment of Tqnyat Alashah, College Altqnyat Altbyh, The Islamic University, Najaf, IraqChetansinh R. VaghelaFaculty of Science, Gokul Global University, Sidhpur, Gujarat, IndiaM. Surya Prakash ReddyDepartment of Physics & Electronics, School of Sciences, JAIN (Deemed to be University), Bangalore, Karnataka, IndiaPardeep Singh BainsCentre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University, Rajpura, Punjab, IndiaSanjeev KumarDepartment of Physics, University Institute of Sciences, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, IndiaRasulbek EshmetovDepartment of Natural science, Mamun University, Khiva, UzbekistanZokir AtaullaevNatural Science Department, Urganch State Pedagogical Institute, Urgench, Uzbekistan
Modern Physics Letters Ajournal2026en
ABI

Аннотация

We develop a fully reproducible observable-level framework to test horizon scale models with Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) ring diameter constraints for M87* and Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*). Rather than reanalyzing interferometric visibilities, we use EHT data products for the ring diameter [Formula: see text] and the calibrated gravitational angular scale [Formula: see text] and map them to a baseline general relativity shadow diameter prediction. We quantify any net mismatch between the observed ring diameter and the baseline shadow scale by an effective shift parameter [Formula: see text], which aggregates emission and propagation effects at the observable level without specifying a microscopic plasma model. Calibration uncertainty in [Formula: see text] is propagated by treating [Formula: see text] as a nuisance parameter constrained by EHT and marginalizing it in the likelihood, including a split normal representation for asymmetric errors. Using EHT constraints, we obtain [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], both consistent with [Formula: see text] within current uncertainties. We further provide joint constraints in a common difference parameterization enabling compact cross-target consistency tests that can be straightforwardly updated as improved EHT constraints become available.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган

Мавзулар

Идентификаторлар

Иқтибослар ва манбалар