Defamation Laws In The Age Of Digital Expression: Rethinking Classical Doctrines

The advent of the internet, social media platforms, and other digital communication technologies has fundamentally transformed the landscape in which reputational harm is inflicted, perpetuated, and remedied. Classical defamation doctrines, developed during eras dominated by print and broadcast media, struggle to address the speed, reach, anonymity, and persistence characteristic of digital expression. This article critically examines the historical foundations of defamation law, traces its doctrinal evolution from English common law through modern statutory regimes, and analyzes how digital expression challenges traditional concepts such as publication, jurisdiction, identification of speakers, and the public-private figure dichotomy [1]. Drawing on landmark cases and emerging jurisprudence, the article argues that the rigid application of classical doctrines produces both under-protection of reputation and over-restriction of free expression in the digital sphere. It proposes a framework for rethinking defamation law that integrates platform liability, algorithmic amplification, contextual integrity, and jurisdictional cooperation [2]. The discussion concludes with policy recommendations balancing the constitutional values of free speech and human dignity in an era where reputational harm can be global, instantaneous, and indelible.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган