Асосий контентга ўтиш
Мақола

Intelligence-Based Hematological Diagnostics: Comparative Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for White Blood Cell Segmentation

Vaibhav C. GandhiDepartment of Computer Engineering, Madhuben and Bhanubhai PatelInstitute of Technology (MBIT), The Charutar Vidya Mandal (CVM) University, Gujarat, IndiaPreethi SekarDepartment of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SRM TRP Engineering College, Trichy-622105, Tamil Nadu, IndiaAli K. Abdul RaheemUniversity of Warith Al-Anbiyaa , Karbala Iraq ,Kasim Sakran AbassDepartment of Physiology, Biochemistry, and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Kirkuk, Kirkuk 36001, IraqMekhrbonu RakhimovaDepartment of Applied Informatics, Kimyo International University in Tashkent, Tashkent, UzbekistanMohammad KhisheImam Khomeini Naval Science University of Nowshahr, Nowshahr, Iran
2026en
ABI

Аннотация

Proper segmentation of white blood cells (WBCs) plays a crucial role in automated hematological image analysis and computer-assisted diagnostic systems. In this work, the authors compare 5 deep learning architectures: U-Net, U-Net++, Attention U-Net, ResUNet and Mask R-CNN on three datasets BCCD, Raabin-WBC and TNBC-WBC. A ten-fold cross-validation was performed for each dataset separately, with a shared data-augmentation and preprocessing scheme. The Dice coefficient, Intersection over Union, precision and recall were used to evaluate the segmentation performance. The computational properties such as model size, floating-point operations, training time and inference time were also investigated. To understand the regions in the image that affect model predictions, qualitative interpretability analysis was conducted using Grad-CAM and the attention-gate visualizations. The highest cross-dataset macro-average performance was obtained by U-Net++ with the Dice coefficient of 94.27% and the IoU of 89.50%. U-Net and ResUNet also showed competitive results, especially on the images that are heterogeneously stained and have low contrast and complex cellular morphology. The architecture-specific segregation trade-offs between performance and complexity of the model and inference speed were identified using computational profiling. Overall, the results indicate that the U-Net++ is the best of the models analyzed, and Attention U-Net and ResUNet are competitive for the difficult WBC images. The study offers a uniform benchmarking platform for assessing performance, computational complexity, and interpretability of deep learning models for WBC segmentation.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган

Идентификаторлар

Иқтибослар ва манбалар