Асосий контентга ўтиш
AkademIndex

Маҳсулотлар

Ишлаб чиқувчилар учун

AkademBaseЭкотизим учун очиқ API
Мақола

Predicting global numbers of teleomorphic ascomycetes

Indunil C. SenanayakeGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 3688, Guangdong, ChinaDhandevi PemCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandAchala R. RathnayakaCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandSubodini N. WijesingheCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandSaowaluck TibprommaCIFOR-ICRAF China Program, World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, ChinaDhanushka N. WanasingheCIFOR-ICRAF China Program, World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, ChinaRungtiwa PhookamsakCIFOR-ICRAF China Program, World Agroforestry (ICRAF), Kunming, 650201, Yunnan, ChinaNuwan D. KularathnageCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandDeecksha GomdolaCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandDulanjalee HarishchandraBeijing Key Laboratory of Environment Friendly Management On Fruit Diseases and Pests in North China, Institute of Plant and Environment Protection, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing, 100097, ChinaLakmali S. DissanayakeEngineering Research Center of the Utilization for Characteristic Bio-Pharmaceutical Resources in Southwest, Ministry of Education, Guizhou University, Guiyang, 550025, Guizhou, ChinaMeimei XiangInnovative Institute for Plant Health, Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, Haizhu District, Guangzhou, 510225, ChinaAnusha H. EkanayakaCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandEric H. C. McKenzieManaaki Whenua-Landcare Research, Auckland Mail Centre, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, 1142, New ZealandKevin D. HydeCenter of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, ThailandHaoxing ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 3688, Guangdong, ChinaNing XieGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan, Shenzhen, 3688, Guangdong, China
2022en
ABI

Аннотация

Abstract Sexual reproduction is the basic way to form high genetic diversity and it is beneficial in evolution and speciation of fungi. The global diversity of teleomorphic species in Ascomycota has not been estimated. This paper estimates the species number for sexual ascomycetes based on five different estimation approaches, viz. by numbers of described fungi, by fungus:substrate ratio, by ecological distribution, by meta-DNA barcoding or culture-independent studies and by previous estimates of species in Ascomycota. The assumptions were made with the currently most accepted, “2.2–3.8 million” species estimate and results of previous studies concluding that 90% of the described ascomycetes reproduce sexually. The Catalogue of Life, Species Fungorum and published research were used for data procurement. The average value of teleomorphic species in Ascomycota from all methods is 1.86 million, ranging from 1.37 to 2.56 million. However, only around 83,000 teleomorphic species have been described in Ascomycota and deposited in data repositories. The ratio between described teleomorphic ascomycetes to predicted teleomorphic ascomycetes is 1:22. Therefore, where are the undiscovered teleomorphic ascomycetes? The undescribed species are no doubt to be found in biodiversity hot spots, poorly-studied areas and species complexes. Other poorly studied niches include extremophiles, lichenicolous fungi, human pathogens, marine fungi, and fungicolous fungi. Undescribed species are present in unexamined collections in specimen repositories or incompletely described earlier species. Nomenclatural issues, such as the use of separate names for teleomorph and anamorphs, synonyms, conspecific names, illegitimate and invalid names also affect the number of described species. Interspecies introgression results in new species, while species numbers are reduced by extinctions.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган

Идентификаторлар

Иқтибослар ва манбалар

2 та иқтибос0 та фойдаланилган манба