Асосий контентга ўтиш
AkademIndex

Маҳсулотлар

Ишлаб чиқувчилар учун

AkademBaseЭкотизим учун очиқ API
Мақола

How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?

Simona BassuUnité d'Agronomie INRA‐AgroParisTech BP 01 Thiverval‐Grignon 78850 FranceNadine BrissonUnité d'Agronomie INRA‐AgroParisTech BP 01 Thiverval‐Grignon 78850 FranceJ. L. DurandUnité de Recherche Pluridisciplinaire sur la Prairie et les Plantes Fourragères INRA BP 80006 Lusignan 86600 FranceKenneth J. BooteDepartment of Agronomy University of Florida P.O. Box 110500 Gainesville FL 32611 USAJon LizasoDepartment Producción Vegetal, Fitotecnia University Politécnica of Madrid Madrid 28040 SpainJames W. JonesDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering University of Florida P.O. Box 110570 Gainesville FL 32611 USACynthia RosenzweigClimate Impacts Group NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway New York NY 10025 USAAlex C. RuaneClimate Impacts Group NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 2880 Broadway New York NY 10025 USAMyriam AdamUMR AGAP/PAM CIRAD Av. Agropolis Montpellier FranceChristian BaronCIRAD UMR TETIS 500 rue J‐F. Breton Montpellier F‐34093 FranceBruno BassoDepartment Crop Systems, Forestry and Environmental Sciences University of Basilicata Potenza ItalyChristian BiernathInstitute für Bodenökologie Helmholtz Zentrum München Ingolstädter Landstraße 1 D‐85764 Neuherberg GermanyHendrik BoogaardJ.G. ConijnWUR‐Plant Research International Wageningen University and Research Centre P.O. Box 16 6700AA Wageningen The NetherlandsMarc CorbeelsCIRAD‐Annual Cropping Systems C/O Embrapa‐Cerrados Km 18, BR 020 ‐ Rodovia Brasília/Fortaleza, CP 08223, CEP 73310‐970 Planaltina DF BrazilDelphine DeryngTyndall Centre for Climate Change research and School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich NR4 7TJ UKGiacomo De SanctisSebastian GaylerWater & Earth System Science (WESS) Competence Cluster c/o University of Tübingen Tübingen 72074 GermanyPatricio GrassiniDepartment of Agronomy and Horticulture University of Nebraska‐Lincoln 178 Keim Hall‐East Campus Lincoln NE 68503‐0915 USAJerry L. HatfieldUSDA‐ARS National Soil Tilth Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment 2110 University Boulevard Ames IA 50011 USASteven HoekCesar IzaurraldePacific Northwest National Laboratory and University of Maryland 5825 University Research Court Suite 3500 College Park MD 20740 USAR.E.E. JongschaapWUR‐Plant Research International Wageningen University and Research Centre P.O. Box 16 6700AA Wageningen The NetherlandsArmen R. KemanianDepartment of Plant Science The Pennsylvania State University 247 Agricultural Sciences and Industries Building University Park PA 16802 USAKurt Christian KersebaumInstitute of Landscape Systems Analysis ZALF Leibniz‐Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research Eberswalder Str. 84 D‐15374 Muencheberg GermanySoo‐Hyung KimSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences University of Washington Seattle WA 98195‐4115 USANaresh S. KumarIndian Agricultural Research Institute Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture New Delhi 110012 IndiaDavid MakowskiUnité d'Agronomie INRA‐AgroParisTech BP 01 Thiverval‐Grignon 78850 FranceChristoph MüllerPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research Telegraphenberg A 31 P.O. Box 60 12 03 D‐14412 Potsdam GermanyClaas NendelInstitute of Landscape Systems Analysis ZALF Leibniz‐Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research Eberswalder Str. 84 D‐15374 Muencheberg GermanyEckart PriesackInstitute für Bodenökologie Helmholtz Zentrum München Ingolstädter Landstraße 1 D‐85764 Neuherberg GermanyMaria Virginia PraviaDepartment of Plant Science The Pennsylvania State University 247 Agricultural Sciences and Industries Building University Park PA 16802 USAFederico SauDepartment Producción Vegetal, Fitotecnia University Politécnica of Madrid Madrid 28040 SpainIurii ShcherbakDepartment Crop Systems, Forestry and Environmental Sciences University of Basilicata Potenza ItalyFulu TaoInstitute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 100101 ChinaEdmar TeixeiraSustainable Production The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited Lincoln Canterbury New ZealandDennis TimlinCrop Systems and Global Change Laboratory USDA/ARS 10300 Baltimore avenue BLDG 001 BARC‐WEST Beltsville 20705‐2350 MD USAKatharina WahaIndian Agricultural Research Institute Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture New Delhi 110012 India
2014en
ABI

Аннотация

Potential consequences of climate change on crop production can be studied using mechanistic crop simulation models. While a broad variety of maize simulation models exist, it is not known whether different models diverge on grain yield responses to changes in climatic factors, or whether they agree in their general trends related to phenology, growth, and yield. With the goal of analyzing the sensitivity of simulated yields to changes in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations [CO2 ], we present the largest maize crop model intercomparison to date, including 23 different models. These models were evaluated for four locations representing a wide range of maize production conditions in the world: Lusignan (France), Ames (USA), Rio Verde (Brazil) and Morogoro (Tanzania). While individual models differed considerably in absolute yield simulation at the four sites, an ensemble of a minimum number of models was able to simulate absolute yields accurately at the four sites even with low data for calibration, thus suggesting that using an ensemble of models has merit. Temperature increase had strong negative influence on modeled yield response of roughly -0.5 Mg ha(-1) per °C. Doubling [CO2 ] from 360 to 720 μmol mol(-1) increased grain yield by 7.5% on average across models and the sites. That would therefore make temperature the main factor altering maize yields at the end of this century. Furthermore, there was a large uncertainty in the yield response to [CO2 ] among models. Model responses to temperature and [CO2 ] did not differ whether models were simulated with low calibration information or, simulated with high level of calibration information.

Ҳали таржима қилинмаган

Идентификаторлар

Иқтибослар ва манбалар

2 та иқтибос0 та фойдаланилган манба