Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest

DESI CollaborationIRFU, SaclayMunawar KarimAguilar, J.Boston UAhlen, S.Laguna U., TenerifeC. Allende PrietoMichigan UnitedAlves, O.Abhijeet AnandMichigan U., MCTPU. AndradeIRFU, SaclayArmengaud, E.UNAM, CCFAviles, A.Bailey, S.A. BaultJayashree BeheraRochester US. BenZviBrera ObservDavide BianchiSwinburne U., Ctr. Astrophys. SupercomputChris BlakeA. BrodzellerUniversity Coll. LondonDavid BrooksChicago U., Astron. Astrophys. CtrE. Buckley‐GeerIRFU, SaclayE. BurtinR. CalderónPortsmouth U., ICGR. E. A. CanningIAC, La LagunaA. Carnero RosellEdinburgh U., Inst. AstronP. CarrilhoBarcelona, IFAELidia CasasBarcelona, IEECF. J. CastanderSussex UR. CereskaiteOhio State UM. CharlesE. ChaussidonBarcelona, IFAEJ. Chaves-MonteroIRFU, SaclayD. ChebatT. ClaybaughDurham U., ICCS. ColeTaiwan, Natl. Tsing Hua UAndrew P. CooperAndrei CuceuK. S. DawsonRoger de BelsunceUNAM, MexicoAxel de la MacorraIRFU, SaclayArnaud de MattiaMadrid, CIEMATN. DeiossoNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonJ. Della CostaNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonArjun DeyToronto U., Astron. DeptBiprateep DeyZ. DingUniversity Coll. LondonP. DoelUC, Berkeley, Math. DeptJ. EdelsteinHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr. AstrophysDaniel J. EisensteinDurham U., ICCWillem ElbersNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonParker FagreliusMenlo SchoolK. FanningLBL, BerkeleyS. FerraroBarcelona, IFAEAndreu Font-RiberaJ. E. Forero-RomeroC. García-QuinteroFlatiron InstituteLehman H. GarrisonPortsmouth U., ICGE. GaztañagaU. Barcelona (main)Héctor Gil-MarínSatya Gontcho A GontchoGuanajuato UA. X. Gonzalez-MoralesBarcelona, IFAEC. GordonUC, IrvineD. GreenFermilabG. GutierrezJ. GuyLSST, TucsonChang Hoon HahnOhio State UM. HerboldParis, Inst. AstrophysH. K. Herrera-AlcantarKEK, TsukubaHo, M. -F.Chicago U., KICPK. HonscheidQueensland UCullan HowlettMichigan UDragan HutererMustapha IshakFermilabS. JuneauOhio State UNaim Göksel KaraçaylıSouthern Methodist US. KentUC, IrvineD. KirkbyTheodore KisnerLaguna U., TenerifeKitaura, F. -S.Cambridge U., Inst. of AstronS. E. KoposovKremin, A.University Coll. LondonO. LahavHarvard-Smithsonian Ctr. AstrophysC. LammanMartin LandriauPerimeter Inst. Theor. PhysDustin LangNew York U., Courant InstJ. LaskerIRFU, SaclayGoff, J. M. LeLPNHE, ParisGuillou, L. LeUC, Santa Cruz, Inst. Part. PhysAlexie LeauthaudM. E. LeviQiong LiToronto U., Astron. DeptTing S. LiKorean Association for the Study of Intestinal DiseasesK. LodhaBarcelona, IFAEMartine LokkenIRFU, SaclayC. MagnevilleBarcelona, Autonoma UMarc ManeraOhio State UPaul MartiniKASI, DaeJeonWilliam L. MatthewsonPatrick McDonaldNatl. Solar Observ., TucsonAaron MeisnerLPSC, GrenobleJ. Mena-FernándezInstitut Català de Ciències del Clima
ArXiv.orgrepository2025en
ABI

Annotatsiya

We present the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) measurements with the Lyman-alpha (LyA) forest from the second data release (DR2) of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) survey. Our BAO measurements include both the auto-correlation of the LyA forest absorption observed in the spectra of high-redshift quasars and the cross-correlation of the absorption with the quasar positions. The total sample size is approximately a factor of two larger than the DR1 dataset, with forest measurements in over 820,000 quasar spectra and the positions of over 1.2 million quasars. We describe several significant improvements to our analysis in this paper, and two supporting papers describe improvements to the synthetic datasets that we use for validation and how we identify damped LyA absorbers. Our main result is that we have measured the BAO scale with a statistical precision of 1.1% along and 1.3% transverse to the line of sight, for a combined precision of 0.65% on the isotropic BAO scale at $z_{eff} = 2.33$. This excellent precision, combined with recent theoretical studies of the BAO shift due to nonlinear growth, motivated us to include a systematic error term in LyA BAO analysis for the first time. We measure the ratios $D_H(z_{eff})/r_d = 8.632 \pm 0.098 \pm 0.026$ and $D_M(z_{eff})/r_d = 38.99 \pm 0.52 \pm 0.12$, where $D_H = c/H(z)$ is the Hubble distance, $D_M$ is the transverse comoving distance, $r_d$ is the sound horizon at the drag epoch, and we quote both the statistical and the theoretical systematic uncertainty. The companion paper presents the BAO measurements at lower redshifts from the same dataset and the cosmological interpretation.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Mavzular

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

0 ta iqtibos0 ta foydalanilgan manba