Asosiy kontentga oʻtish
Maqola

<i>Euclid</i> preparation

M. GuidiUniversity of BolognaA VeropalumboINFN-Sezione di GenovaA. PugnoUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieM. MorescoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaE. SefusattiIFPU, Institute for Fundamental Physics of the UniverseC. PorcianiUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieE BranchiniINFN-Sezione di GenovaMichel-Andrès BretonUniversité Paris-Saclay, Université Paris Cité, CEA, CNRS, AIMB. Camacho QuevedoSISSA, International School for Advanced StudiesM. CrocceInstitut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), Edifici RDIT, Campus UPCS. de la TorreAix-Marseille Université, CNRS, CNES, LAMVincent DesjacquesTechnion Israel Institute of TechnologyAlexander EggemeierUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für AstronomieA. FarinaINFN-Sezione di GenovaM. KärcherAix-Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, CPTD. LindeMarco MarinucciINFN-PadovaAzadeh Moradinezhad DizgahUniversité Savoie Mont BlancClaudio MorettiSISSA, International School for Advanced StudiesKevin PardedeA. PezzottaMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsE SarpaICSC – Centro Nazionale di Ricerca in High Performance Computing, Big Data e Quantum ComputingA. AmaraSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of SurreyS AndreonINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di BreraN AuricchioINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaC. BaccigalupiINFN, Sezione di TriesteD BagotCentre National d’Etudes Spatiales – Centre spatial de ToulouseMarco BaldiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di BolognaS. BardelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaPietro BattagliaINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaA. BivianoINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteM. BresciaDepartment of Physics “E. Pancini”, University Federico IIS. CameraDipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di TorinoG Cañas-HerreraLeiden Observatory, Leiden UniversityV. CapobiancoINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoChris CarboneINAF-IASF MilanoV. F. CardoneINFN-Sezione di RomaJ. CarreteroCentro de Investigaciones Energéticas, Medioambientales y Tecnológicas (CIEMAT)M. CastellanoNational Institute for AstrophysicsG. CastignaniINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaS. CavuotiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di CapodimonteK. C. ChambersInstitute for Astronomy, University of HawaiiA. CimattiDipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Augusto Righi” – Alma Mater Studiorum Università di BolognaC. Colodro-CondeInstituto de Astrofísica de CanariasG. CongedoInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryL. ConversiESAC/ESAY. CopinCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF. CourbinInstitut de Ciències del Cosmos (ICCUB), Universitat de Barcelona (IEEC-UB)H. M. CourtoisCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueA. Da SilvaInstituto de Astrofísica e Ciências do Espaço, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de LisboaH. DegaudenziDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaG. De LuciaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteH. DoleUniversité Paris-Saclay, CNRS, Institut d’astrophysique spatialeM. DouspisInstitut d'Astrophysique SpatialeF. DubathDepartment of Astronomy, University of GenevaX DupacESAC/ESAS DusiniINFN-PadovaS. EscoffierAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMM. FarinaINAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia SpazialiR FarinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaF. FaustiniSpace Science Data Center, Italian Space AgencyS. FerriolCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueF FinelliINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaP. FosalbaInstitute of Space Sciences (ICE, CSIC), Campus UABS. FotopoulouBristol Robotics LaboratoryM. FrailisINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteE. FranceschiINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaM. FumanaINAF-IASF MilanoS. GaleottaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteB. GillisInstitute for Astronomy, University of Edinburgh, Royal ObservatoryC. GiocoliINFN-Sezione di BolognaJ. Gracia-CarpioMax Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial PhysicsA EniaINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di PadovaF GruppUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenL. GuzzoINFN-Sezione di MilanoS. V. H. HauganInstitute of Theoretical PhysicsW. HolmesJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyF. HormuthFelix Hormuth EngineeringA. HornstrupTechnical University of DenmarkK. JahnkęMax-Planck-Institut für AstronomieM. JhabvalaNASA Goddard Space Flight CenterB. JoachimiDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College LondonE. KeihänenS. KermicheAix-Marseille Université, CNRS/IN2P3, CPPMA. KiesslingJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of TechnologyB. KubikUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IP2I Lyon, UMR 5822M KümmelUniversitäts-Sternwarte München, Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenM KunzUniversité de Genève, Département de Physique Théorique and Centre for Astroparticle PhysicsH Kurki-SuonioDepartment of PhysicsA. M. C. Le BrunSorbonne UniversitéS. LigoriINAF-Osservatorio Astrofisico di TorinoP. B. LiljeInstitute of Theoretical PhysicsV. LindholmDepartment of PhysicsI LloroSKA ObservatoryG. MainettiCentre de Calcul de l’IN2P3/CNRSD. MainoINFN-Sezione di MilanoE. MaioranoINAF-Osservatorio di Astrofisica e Scienza dello Spazio di BolognaO. MansuttiINAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di TriesteS. MarcinUniversity of Applied Sciences and Arts of Northwestern Switzerland, School of Computer ScienceO. MarggrafUniversität Bonn, Argelander-Institut für Astronomie
Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by

ABI

Annotatsiya

We investigated the accuracy and range of validity of the perturbative model for the two-point (2PCF) and three-point (3PCF) correlation functions in real space in view of the forthcoming analysis of the Euclid mission spectroscopic sample. We took advantage of clustering measurements from four snapshots of the Flagship I N -body simulations at z = {0.9,1.2,1.5,1.8}, which mimic the expected galaxy population in the ideal case, i.e. in the absence of observational effects such as purity and completeness. For the 3PCF we considered all available triangular configurations given a minimal separation ( r min ). We first assessed the model performance by fixing the cosmological parameters and evaluating the goodness of fit provided by the perturbative bias expansion in the joint analysis of the two statistics, finding an overall agreement with the data down to separations of 20 h −1 Mpc. Subsequently, we built on the state-of-the-art analysis and extended it to include the dependence on three cosmological parameters: the amplitude of scalar perturbations ( A s ), the matter density ( ω cdm ), and the Hubble parameter ( h ). To achieve this goal, we developed an emulator capable of generating fast and robust modelling predictions for the two summary statistics, which thus enables an efficient sampling of the joint likelihood function. We therefore present the first joint full-shape analysis of the real-space 2PCF and 3PCF, testing the consistency and constraining power of the perturbative model across both probes and assessing its performance in a combined likelihood framework. We explored possible systematic uncertainties induced by the perturbative model at small scales, finding an optimal scale cut of r min = 30 h −1 Mpc for the 3PCF when imposing an additional limitation on the nearly isosceles triangular configurations included in the data vector. This work is part of a series of papers in which we validate theoretical models for galaxy clustering measurements in preparation for the Euclid mission.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Mavzular

Identifikatorlar

Iqtiboslar va manbalar