Maqola

In Vitro Analysis of Compressive Strength of Three Different Aesthetic Restorative Materials

Rohit NagarSimone GrandiniDepartment of Endodontics, Periodontology, Restorative and Paediatric Dentistry, University of Siena, ItalyCarlo GaetaUnit of Periodontology, Endodontics and Restorative Dentistry, Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, ItalySumit DubeyNiladri MaitiSchool of Dentistry, Central Asian University, Tashkent, UzbekistanMadhura Avinash JadhavDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Pune, Maharashtra, IndiaNeerieza KonthoujamIntern, Kalinga Institute of Dental Sciences, KIIT Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India

2025en

Ochiq kirishOltin

Litsenziya: cc-by-nc-sa

Manbada oʻqishdoi.org(yangi oynada ochiladi)

ABI

Annotatsiya

A BSTRACT Aim: The study aims to assess and contrast the compressive strengths of three aesthetically pleasing restorative materials. Materials and Methods: Using metallic molds, 30 pellets were created, then split into 3 groups of 10, each meeting the required specifications. Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group A; Resin Modified GIC (RMGIC) cylindrical specimens are in Group B; and Zirconomer cylindrical specimens are in Group C. A universal testing equipment was used to compress all of the samples, and the results were acquired. Tukey’s post hoc test and one-way ANOVA were used for statistical analysis. Result: Zirconomer’s compressive strength is significantly higher than that of RMGIC and GIC. Conclusion: The compressive strength of Zirconomer is the highest. As a result, Zirconomer may be the preferred material for aesthetic restorative procedures.

Hali tarjima qilinmagan

Identifikatorlar

DOI: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1884_24

Iqtiboslar va manbalar

0 ta iqtibos8 ta foydalanilgan manba